Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal DiseaseDuncan, Andrew
History
Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal Disease
Duncan, Andrew
Mercury -- Therapeutic use -- Early works to 1800; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Early works to 1800
The efficacy of this preparation has not indeed, as far as I know, been
confirmed by long or extensive practice. But, where it is proper to heal
superficial ulcers, no application is of greater service than dressings
of lint dipt in a solution of the corrosive sublimate in the proportion
of half a grain to an ounce of water. The addition of a small quantity
of compound spirit of lavender to this solution will give it a colour
and smell different from those of common water, which, with some
patients, are necessary conditions to an effectual application. In some
circumstances already mentioned, the other modes of applying mercury to
act immediately upon the diseased part may be preferable to this. But,
where the only requisite to the healing of an ulcer is the destruction
of that venereal virus at the part which supports a diseased state
there, no application will answer the purpose with greater facility,
safety, and expedition, than this solution.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAP. VI.
_Of the Mercurial Preparations intended to act in the cure of Lues
Venerea by entering the System._
AN attempt has already been made to explain the operation of mercury,
and the manner in which the venereal poison may be supposed to exist as
a cause of disease. From these it might perhaps be concluded, that the
introduction of mercury into the system was seldom requisite. And it
might seem reasonable to infer, that all the advantage which could be
obtained from mercury, might be had from its application in one or other
of the ways already mentioned. So far, however, is this from being the
case, that it is no uncommon thing with practitioners to inveigh, in the
most express terms, against all external applications, those excepted
which are of the mildest and most inactive nature. Mercurials have not
been excluded, and the healing up of sores, by whatever external means
it may be effected, has been considered as highly prejudicial.
It can by no means be asserted, that these accusations against the
external use of mercury are entirely without foundation. If properly
understood, however, they may be true, without being any objection to
the theory. It can never be imagined, that, from the destruction of the
venereal virus at a particular part, by any application made there, it
should be destroyed in the rest of the system. When, therefore, the
venereal virus has already been absorbed, a radical cure cannot be
expected from the healing of an ulcer. It may even sometimes happen,
that, from a partial destruction of the virus in an ulcer, it may be
healed externally, and, at the same time, absorption more considerably
promoted than if it had remained open.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account