It appears that Scot had ambitions in the way of ecclesiastical
preferment; but though the Emperor put himself out to secure his
favourite the position which he coveted, and in fact appealed to the
Pope on his behalf, nothing practical came of these representations.
Probably Scot’s fame was of too dubious a kind to recommend him to the
heads of the orthodox Church, and the Archbishop of Canterbury, to whom
the Pope applied in his interest, does not seem to have responded in any
friendly fashion. Finally, an offer was made to Michael Scot of the
Archbishopric of Cashel in Ireland, but in those days the Irish were
little better than a barbarous race, and they spoke the language of
Erse, which was a sealed book to their prospective bishop. In any case,
though the Chapter had actually elected him to the post, he decided to
decline. He apparently had too much principle to accept the position of
an absentee bishop, and a home among a wild and uncultured race would
hardly have been to the liking of a man who had associated with the most
intellectual minds of Europe. These hopes of ecclesiastical preferment
having fallen through, Frederick, after long delay, decided to take
steps for the publication of the translation of the works of Averroes,
and certain books of Aristotle, with the commentaries thereon of the
Arabian philosophers. He issued an imperial circular announcing the
appearance of these, and sent Michael Scot as his emissary to arrange
for their publication in the principal European centres of learning.
Finally, after visiting Bologna and Paris, Scot made his way to England,
where he appears to have visited Oxford about the year 1230. Tradition
says that he journeyed thence to his native land of Scotland. But
shortly after this we lose sight of him altogether, and though there is
no authoritative evidence with regard to his death, he seems to have
passed away by or before the year 1232. In this year the _Abbreviatio
Avicennæ_ was published at Melfi, in the Latin version which Scot had
translated. Henry of Colonia was selected by Frederick to transcribe the
work from the imperial copy, and Scot’s biographer is probably right in
regarding this work as a wreath laid by his imperial friend on his
grave. The matter would assuredly have been placed in Scot’s own hands
if he were still alive.
Scot is related to have foretold that his death would take place by the
blow of a stone falling on his head, and tradition says that being in
church one day with head uncovered at the sacring of the mass, a stone,
shaken from the tower by the motion of the bell rope, fell upon his
head, mortally wounding him. Presumably this incident occurred in
Scotland; if, that is, there is any truth at all in the story.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account