-----+-------+--------+-------+----------
Years| United States | |British
| | Total |Empire
-----+-------+--------| |(including
|Oversea|Enrolled| | Colonies)
-----+-------+--------+-------+----------
1838|2,791 |190,632 |193,423| 82,716
1840|4,155 |198,184 |202,339| 95,807
1842|4,701 |224,960 |229,681| 118,930
1844|6,909 |265,270 |272,179| 125,675
1846|6,287 |341,606 |347,893| 144,784
1848|16,068 |411,823 |427,891| 168,087
1850|44,942 |481,005 |525,947| 187,631
1852|79,704 |563,536 |643,240| 227,306
1854|95,036 |581,571 |676,607| 326,484
1855|115,045| ... | ... | ...
1856|89,715 |583,362 |673,077| 417,717
1858|78,027 |651,363 |729,390| 488,415
1860|97,269 |770,641 |500,144| 500,144
-----+-------+--------+-------+----------
It will be seen from this table how great the extension of the use of
the steamboat had been in the United States in these earlier years, as
compared with that elsewhere. In 1852 our enrolled tonnage had grown to
more than half a million tons, or well on to three times the whole of
that of the British Empire, and our oversea tonnage was about one-third
of that of Great Britain and her dependencies.
One reason for this very rapid increase in the enrolled tonnage was,
of course, the fact that railroads had not yet begun to seam the West,
as they were shortly to do: the steamboat was the great and absolutely
necessary means of transport, and was to hold its prominence in this
regard for some years yet to come. When this change came, there came
with it a change in circumstances which went far beyond all other
causes in removing our shipping from the great place it had occupied
in the first half of this century. But great as was the effect worked
by this change, there were certain minor causes which have to be taken
into account. We had grown in maritime power through the events of
the Napoleonic wars—which, though they worked ruin to many an unlucky
owner, enriched many more—as we were for some years almost the only
neutral bottoms afloat; we had rapidly increased this power during
the succeeding forty years, during which time our ships were notably
the finest models and the most ably commanded on the seas; the best
blood of New England went into the service, and one has but to read
the reports of the English parliamentary commissions upon the shipping
subject to realize the proud position which our ships and, above all,
our ships’ captains held in the carrying trade. We had entered the
steam competition with an energy and ability that promised much, but
we gave little or no heed to changes in construction until long after
they had been accepted by the rest of the world; and it is to this
conservatism, paradoxical as the expression may seem applied to our
countrymen, that part of our misfortune was due.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account