1830— 2 @ 3 lbs. +--
1835— 5 lbs. +--
1840— 8 „ +--
1845—10 „ +--
1850—14 „ +---
1855—21 „ +----
1860—30 „ +-----
1865—40 „ +-------
1870—50 „ +---------
1875—60 „ +-----------
1880—70 „ +-------------
1882—80 „ +---------------
1885-6—150 @ 180 lbs. +--------------------------------
and
since
Diagram showing increase in Steam-pressures based on good average
Practice
How great an advantage she was upon their first ship will be seen by
the following comparison:
Britannia. Persia.
Coal necessary to steam to
New York 570 tons 1,400 tons
Cargo carried 224 „ 750 „
Passengers 90 250
Indicated power 710 3,600
Pressure per square inch 9 lbs. 33 lbs.
Coal per indicated horse-power
per hour 5.1 „ 3.8 „
Speed 8.5 knots 13.1 knots
Thus, for two and a half times the quantity of coal nearly three and
a half times the cargo was carried, and nearly three times the number
of passengers. This result was due partially to increased engine
efficiency, and partially to increased size of ship; and thus to a
relative reduction of the power necessary to drive a given amount of
displacement.
The Scotia was almost a sister ship to the Persia, slightly exceeding
her in size, but with no radical differences which would mark her
as an advance upon the latter. She was the last of the old régime
in the Atlantic trade, and the same year in which she was built saw
the complete acceptance by the Cunard company of the newer order of
things, in the building of the iron screw steamer China, of 4,000 tons
displacement, with oscillating geared screw engines of 2,200 indicated
horse-power, with an average speed of 12.9 knots on a daily expenditure
of 82 tons of coal. She was the first of their ships to be fitted with
a surface condenser. The Scotia had been built as a paddle steamer
rather in deference to the prejudices of passengers than in conformity
to the judgment of the company, which had put afloat iron screw ships
for their Mediterranean trade as early as 1852 and 1853.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account