Georgia -- Antiquities; Mounds -- Georgia; Ocmulgee National Monument (Ga.)
Tools included grooved stone axes, chipped drills, and large chipped
knife or scraper blades. Mullers, or flared-end “bell” pestles, were
used to reduce wild plant foods to edible form; but the mortars or trays
with which they were used are thought to have been made mostly of wood.
Vessels of soapstone or sandstone were added to the skinlined pit or
basket, and the flat pieces of steatite with a large hole bored in them
may have been used with these containers for stone boiling. Fish were
caught with bone fishhooks and with nets weighted with grooved or
notched stones. Bone was also used for awls, which were probably
employed in making baskets and for simple stitching operations as in the
making of leather moccasins or leggings, as well as for projectile
points and flaking tools. Bone heads served as ornaments, as did bone
pins which were often decorated, though the plainer ones may have been
used merely to secure clothing. Shell was worked into beads of many
varieties, and into gorgets or pendants in addition to the atlatl
weights mentioned.
[Illustration: Shell mound people of the Archaic period are the first
whose axes we can surely identify. The hafting groove encircled the ax
completely or, in the three-quarter-groove form, was omitted from the
bottom edge. Length, 22 inches.]
Life on the shell mounds, or in the camps along streams and rivers where
this source of food was of minor importance, was hardly different in
most of its material aspects from that of the wandering hunters who had
gone before. Permanent dwellings were still apparently unknown; and the
rough shelters which were built were doubtless much the same crude
lean-to of poles and brush or tree bark as formerly. Areas which appear
to have been floored with clay and the remains of many hearths indicate
that the shell mounds themselves were the actual habitation sites. This
is confirmed by the presence of the numerous articles of daily living
mixed in with the shells. The dead, too, were buried directly in the
mound, most commonly in small round pits which required that the corpse
be tightly flexed. Dogs were also buried in this manner occasionally,
and we can guess either that they were loved by their masters or that
they held some special religious significance. The fact that a very few
shell mounds were intentionally formed into a large ring, as much as 300
feet in diameter, provides a definite hint of religious ceremonialism.
From the few objects of daily use or adornment placed with the dead, we
can assume they believed in an after life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account