Architecture, Byzantine; Byzantine Empire; Istanbul (Turkey) -- Description and travel; Justinian I, Emperor of the East, 483?-565
Tricesa, Fort, 111
Tucca, 163
Tzanzakon, 86
Tzumina, 84
U.
Ulmiton, 114
Ulpiana, 92
Unnum, 96
Utos, 112
V.
Valeriana, 112
Variana, 112
Vernes, 109
Viminacium, 109
Virgin, at Porphyreon, House of the, 150
Virgin, at Jericho, Church of the, 147
Virgin, Church of the, 143
Virgin Mary, Church of, 15, 16, 26, 31
W.
Watchtower, 44
Z.
Zamarthas, 57
Zanes, 109
Zebinus, Monastery of, 151
Zenobia, 62, 63, 64
Zetnocortum, 112
Zeugma, 67
Zeuxippus, Baths of, 34
THE END.
BILLING & SONS, PRINTERS, GUILDFORD.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] ‘A new era for Christian architecture commenced with his reign.
The historian Procopius has simplified, in the different provinces of
his Eastern empire, the task to those who would search for vestiges
of buildings erected by this Prince. Anthemius was selected by him as
his architect, and the Church of St. Sophia became the type of all the
Greek churches from the sixth century. The basilica was, until his
time, the type of the Christian church. Anthemius abandoned this form.
The chief feature of the church was the dome, the form of the oblong
nave being abandoned.’—Texier and Pullan, ‘Byzantine Architecture’
(fol., London, 1864), p. 20. (L.)
[2] There is a pun in the original upon παιδιά and παιδέια. Cf. Gibbon,
ch. xl. (S.)
[3] ‘Taken altogether, there is no building erected during the
first thirteen centuries after the Christian era which, as an
interior, is either so beautiful or so worthy of attentive study as
this.’—Fergusson, ‘Handbook of Architecture’ (8vo., London, 1855), p.
951. (L.)
In addition to Procopius, the erection of St. Sophia has been described
by Agathias, and at much greater length by Paulus Silentiarius, and
the three descriptions have been compared and analyzed in the ‘Corpus
Historiæ Byzantinæ,’ _s.v._ Paulus Silentiarius. (L.)
A full description of St. Sophia with plans, sections, and detailed
drawings of the mosaics, sculpture, etc., is given by Salzenburg in his
splendid work ‘Alt Christliche von Constantinopel’ (Berlin, 1854). (L.)
[4] ‘The solid piles which sustained the cupola were composed of
huge blocks of freestone, hewn into squares and triangles, fortified
by circles of iron, and firmly cemented by the infusion of lead and
quicklime.’—Gibbon, ch. xl. (S.)
[5] ‘Nine western doors open into the vestibule, and from thence
into the _narthex_ or exterior portico. That portico was the humble
station of the penitents. The nave, or body of the church, was filled
by the congregation of the faithful; but the two sexes were prudently
distinguished, and the upper and lower galleries were allotted for the
more private devotion of the women.’—Gibbon, ch. xl. (S.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account