Architecture, Byzantine; Byzantine Empire; Istanbul (Turkey) -- Description and travel; Justinian I, Emperor of the East, 483?-565
[6] Λώρους. I am unacquainted with the precise meaning of this word.
Ducange, in his ‘Glossary,’ describes ΛΩΡΟΣ as ‘Fornix,’ ‘arcus,’ Ἁψίς,
quoting Procopius. But this gives no definite information; nor, after
consulting with several well-known authorities on this subject, can I
find that the application of the term is now known. It is not alluded
to either in Britton’s ‘Dictionary,’ or Willis’s ‘Nomenclature of the
Middle Ages.’ From the context and Ducange’s use of the word ἅψις, I
presume that λῶρος is applied to the great arch forming the opening of
an apse. (L.)
[7] Hom. Il., xxii. 27. (S.)
[8] ‘St. Irene templum a Constantino M. extructum—tres sacras ædes.
Deiparæ scilicet, St. Theodori et St. Irenes, eidem magnæ ecclesiæ
unitas fuisse, neque proprium clerum habuisse, qui in iis sacra
ministeria perageret.‘ ‘Unde cum Sophianæ ædis appendix fuerit, intra
ejusdem septa ædificata dicitur.’ ‘Denique concussa est ipsa ædes eo
terræ motu qui accidit Leone Isauro regnante. Hodie intra septum regium
includi.’—Ducange, ‘Byzantinæ Historiæ Scriptoribus Constantinopolis
Christiana’ (Venice, fol., 1729), lib. iv., p. 102.
Rebuilt, in part at all events, by Justinian late in his reign, but
in a style entirely different from that of St. Sophia or SS. Sergius
and Bacchus, being oblong on plan, with aisles and an apse at the east
end. This apse was cleared in 1881. Mr. Edwin Freshfield, who visited
the church at that time, states that he ‘found that it was filled with
marble benches, or steps, somewhat similar to the Church of Torcello,
near Venice. There is no doubt that they formed part of the original
arrangement of the church, and that this was due to its being the
Patriarchal church.’—_Athenæum_, 15th August, 1885. (L.)
[9] _Ædes sacræ Deiparæ dicatæ. Deiparæ Blachernarum._ Ædem vero
Deiparæ Blachernianam a Pulcheria Augusta primum ædificatam scribunt
passim scriptores Byzantini. Hanc postmodum de novo instauravit
Justinus senior (V. Procopius de Ædifs., lib. i., c. iii.). Denique
solo tenus incensum fuisse sub Romano Diogene, restauratum postmodum,
novis ornamentis et nova ædificiorum accessione auxit mire Andronicus
senior.—Ducange, lib. iv., pp, 55, 56. (L.)
[10] ‘Deuterum, Δεύτερον, locus et tractus urbis ita
appellatus occurrit sæpe apud scriptores Byzantinos qui in eo ædes
sacras Stæ. Annas, Sti. Georgii, St. Pauli et SS. Notariorum extitisse
narrant.—Procopius scribens haud procul a St. Annæ æde in Deutero aliam
ædificasse Justinianum Zoæ Martyri, ad ultimam urbis plateam.—Porro
Deuterum dictum fuisse, quod secundo milliari a vetere Byzantio
dissitum esset.’—Ducange, lib. ii., p. 133. (L.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account