Architecture, Byzantine; Byzantine Empire; Istanbul (Turkey) -- Description and travel; Justinian I, Emperor of the East, 483?-565
But there is scarcely one of these edifices, where remains of them
exist or are supposed so to do, which has not been the subject
of controversy, the authorship of the Sakhrah (taking that as an
instance) having been assigned, by various persons who would usually
be considered as authorities on the subject, to the Romans under
Constantine, to the Byzantines under Justinian, and to the Arabs under
Abd-el-Melek.
It becomes, therefore, important to have a clear record as to what
Justinian did, not only in Palestine but in other countries, so as to
be able to judge to some extent, by well-authenticated examples, of the
founders of those edifices whose history is involved in doubt.
Of the writers who can give us this record, none has such authority
as Procopius, or gives so much detailed information; and he has, for
that reason, been largely quoted by Gibbon and by well-nigh every other
writer on Byzantine history; and he gives such definite information as
to the dates of many of Justinian’s buildings which remain to us, as to
form a standard by which to recognise the general characteristics in
outline and detail adopted by his architects in his greatest works, and
which characterize the style now well known as Byzantine.
Its first and greatest example is St. Sofia at Constantinople, which
is, perhaps, the boldest instance of a sudden change in almost every
respect, whether of plan, elevation, or detail, which is known in
architecture.
Before its construction, the ground-plan of well-nigh every building
known to Western architects had defined the plan of all above it.
The columns in the apse of the Basilica, or church, carried galleries
or other erections above it, of varied design, but in the same straight
or curved lines as those beneath them.
The lines of the dome (except in slightly exceptional cases, such as
the ruin known as the Temple of Minerva Medica at Rome, or the Temple
of the Winds at Athens) were carried up on the distinct lines of the
lower walls.
The capitals of the columns in the works of the ancient Greeks or
Romans were in each building carved on the same design; and however
beautiful each might be, the eye would see but one form of the Doric,
Ionic, or Corinthian, through the whole range of a colonnade.
The Byzantines changed all that.
The great dome of St. Sophia (the boldest piece of novel construction
ever, perhaps, attempted) forms the crown of a building quite original
in plan; and this dome is placed, not as that of the Roman Pantheon,
low down on thick walls of its own form, but suspended high above all
the roof around it, on four arches, which spring from detached piers,
the keystone alone of each arch giving a direct support to the dome; in
every other part it overhangs the void in the boldest manner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account