Borrow could look at Nature without thinking of himself—a rare gift, for
Nature, as I have said, has been disappointed in man. Her great desire
from the first has been to grow an organism so conscious that it can turn
round and look at her with intelligent eyes. She has done so at last,
but the consciousness is so high as to be self-conscious, and man cannot
for egotism look at his mother after all. Borrow was a great exception.
Thoreau’s self-consciousness showed itself in presence of Nature,
Borrow’s in presence of man. The very basis of Borrow’s nature was
reverence. His unswerving belief in the beneficence of God was most
beautiful, most touching. In his life Borrow had suffered much: a
temperament such as his must needs suffer much—so shy it was, so proud,
and yet yearning for a close sympathy such as no creature and only
solitary communing with Nature can give. Under any circumstances, I say,
Borrow would have known how sharp and cruel are the flints along the
road—how tender are a poet’s feet; but _his_ road at one time was rough
indeed; not when he was with his gipsy friends (for a tent is freer than
a roof, according to the grammarian of Codling Gap, and roast hedgehog is
the daintiest of viands), but when he was toiling in London, his fine
gifts unrecognized and useless—_that_ was when Borrow passed through the
fire. Yet every sorrow and every disaster of his life he traced to the
kindly hand of a benevolent and wise Father, who sometimes will use a
whip of scorpions, but only to chastise into a right and happy course the
children he loves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account