France was Catholic, but her Catholicism differed essentially from that
of Spain, and during the first part of the seventeenth century was quite
as liberal as the Protestantism of England. When Cromwell was a child
Henry of Navarre was on the French throne, and to him all creeds were
alike. He was succeeded in the actual government of France by the great
Cardinals Richelieu and Mazarin, who were Statesmen rather than
Churchmen; and under them the French Protestants enjoyed rather more
toleration than was allowed the Catholics of England. The natural foes
of France were the two great Catholic powers of Spain and Austria, ruled
by the twin branches of the House of Hapsburg; and her hostility to them
determined her attitude throughout the Thirty Years’ War.
Meanwhile, Holland was at the height of her power. She had a far greater
colonial empire than England, her commercial development was greater,
and the renown of her war marine higher. Drake and Hawkins had but
singed the beard of the Spanish king, had but plundered his vessels and
harassed his great fleets. Van Heemskirk, Piet Hein, and the elder Tromp
crushed the sea-power of Spain by downright hard fighting in great
pitched battles, and captured her silver fleets entire.
In Great Britain itself—it must be kept in mind that Scotland was as yet
an entirely distinct kingdom, united to England only by the fact that
the same line of kings ruled over both—the difference between the Scotch
and the English, though less in degree, was the same in kind as that
between the English and the Dutch. In Scotland, outside of the
Highlands, the mass of the people were devoted with all the strength of
their intense and virile natures to the form of Calvinism introduced by
Knox. Their Church government was Presbyterian. As both the Presbyterian
ministers and their congregations demanded that the State should be
managed in essentials according to the wishes of the Church, the general
feeling was really in the direction of a theocratic republic, although
the name would have frightened them. In Scotland, as in England, no
considerable body of men had yet grasped the idea that there should be
toleration of religious differences or a divorce between the functions
of the State and the Church. In both countries, as elsewhere at the time
through Christendom, religious liberty meant only religious liberty for
the sect that raised the cry; but, as elsewhere, the mere use of the
name as a banner under which to fight brought nearer the day when the
thing itself would be possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account