The Commons had passed a law authorizing the election of a Parliament at
least once in three years: which at once took away the King’s power to
attempt to rule without a Parliament; and in May they extorted from the
King an act that they should not be dissolved without their own consent.
Ship Money was declared to be illegal; the Star Chamber was abolished;
and Tonnage and Poundage were declared illegal, unless levied by Act of
Parliament. Then the Scotch army was paid off and returned across the
Border. The best work of the Commons had now been done, and if they
could have trusted the King it would have been well for them to
dissolve; but the King could not be trusted, and, moreover, the
religious question was pushed to the front. Laud’s actions—actions taken
with the full consent and by the advice of the King—had rendered the
Episcopal form of Church government obnoxious. The House of Commons was
Presbyterian, and it speedily became evident that it wished to establish
the Presbyterian system of Church government in the place of Episcopacy;
and, moreover, that it intended to be just as intolerant on behalf of
Presbyterianism as the King and Laud had been on behalf of Episcopacy.
There was a strong moderate party which the King might have rallied
about him, but his incurable bad faith made it impossible to trust his
protestations. He now made terms with the Scotch, in accordance with
which they agreed not to interfere between himself and his English
subjects in religious matters. He hoped thereby to deprive the
Presbyterian English of their natural allies across the Border. This
conduct, of itself, would have inflamed the increasing religious
bitterness; but it was raised to madness by the news that came from
Ireland at this time.
Inspired by the news of the revolt in Scotland and the troubles in
England, the Irish had risen against their hereditary oppressors. It was
the revolt of a race which rose to avenge wrongs as bitter as ever one
people inflicted upon another; and it was inevitable that it should be
accompanied by appalling outrages in certain places. It was on these
outrages that the English fixed their eyes, naturally ignoring the
generations of English evil-doing which had brought them about. A
furious cry for revenge arose. Every Puritan, from Oliver Cromwell down,
regarded the massacres as a fresh proof that Roman Catholics ought to be
treated, not as professors of another Christian creed, but as cruel
public enemies; and their burning desire for vengeance took the form,
not merely of hostility to Roman Catholicism, but to the Episcopacy,
which they regarded as in the last resort an ally of Catholicism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account