The religious element entered into everything Cromwell did, mixing
curiously with his hard common-sense and practical appreciation of
worldly benefits. It appears in all his letters and speeches. Such a
letter as he wrote to the Speaker of the House after the storming of
Bristol, is in thought and manner more akin to the writings of some old
Hebrew prophet than to those of any conqueror before or after Cromwell’s
time. It is saturated, not merely with biblical phraseology, but with
biblical feeling, all the glory being ascribed to God, and the army
claiming as their sole honor that God had vouchsafed to use them in his
service, and that by faith and prayer they had obtained the favor of the
Most High. It is impossible for a fair-minded and earnest man to read
Cromwell’s letters and reports after action, and the prayers he made and
the psalms he chose to read and to give out before action, and to doubt
the intensity of the man’s religious fervor. In our day such utterances
would be hypocritical. Almost the only modern generals in whom they
would have been the sincere expression of inward belief were Stonewall
Jackson and Gordon; and the times had changed so utterly that even they
could not possibly give utterance to them as Cromwell did. But in
Cromwell’s time the most earnest Puritans thought as he did, and
expressed their thoughts as he did. That such expression should lend
itself very readily to hypocrisy was inevitable; indeed, it was perhaps
inevitable that the habitual use of such expression should breed
somewhat of hypocrisy in almost any user. The incessant employment by
Cromwell and his comrades of the word “saints,” to distinguish
themselves and those who thought like them, is particularly
objectionable in its offensive self-consciousness.
In this letter about the taking of Bristol Cromwell touches upon the
religious differences which were the great causes of division among the
victors. He writes:
“Presbyterians, Independents, all have here the same spirit of faith and
prayer; the same presence and answer; they agree here; have no names of
difference; pity it is it should be otherwise anywhere.... And for
brethren in things of the mind we look for no compulsion but that of
light and reason.”
Cromwell strove earnestly to bring about harmony between the
Independents of the New Model army and the Presbyterians, who were
dominant in Parliament. Even in that day there were in private life men
of high character and great intellect who believed in true religious
liberty, men who stood far ahead of Cromwell; but Cromwell was equally
far ahead of all the men who then had any real control in public life;
so far ahead, indeed, that he could not get any considerable body of
public opinion abreast of him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account