Omnibuses and cabs : $b their origin and historyMoore, Henry Charles
History
Omnibuses and cabs : $b their origin and history
Moore, Henry Charles
Cab and omnibus service; Carriages and carts; Horse-drawn omnibuses
Shortly after the strike a clergyman, named Jenkins, who had gained
considerable notoriety by, among other eccentricities, persistently
refusing to show his ticket to tramway inspectors, turned his attention
to omnibuses. But as omnibus inspectors have not the power to compel
a passenger to show his ticket, Mr. Jenkins was able to enjoy himself
with impunity. However, after many quarrels with ’busmen about various
trivial matters, he hit, eventually, upon a real grievance. On nearly
all omnibuses a long narrow board bearing some advertisement, such
as “To Swan and Edgar’s,” was fixed, outside, across the middle of
the side windows. Mr. Jenkins, declared, with truth, that the boards
obstructed the view of passengers inside the omnibus, and thereby
frequently caused them to be carried beyond the place where they
wished to alight. On the same grounds he denounced the transparent
advertisements stuck on the side and front windows. His complaint
was warmly supported by the public, and the objectionable boards,
together with the advertisements on the front windows, were ordered to
be removed. The front window advertisements had been abolished but a
very short time when the police authorities compelled the proprietors
to block up those windows by placing on them the route the omnibus
travelled. Consequently the state of affairs, as far as the front
windows were concerned, was worse than before. These route-bills have
since been reduced in size.
While Mr. Jenkins was denouncing omnibus tickets, inspectors and
advertisements, a quarrel occurred between the London General Omnibus
Company and the Camden Town Omnibus Association. The London General
Omnibus Company had become a member of this old-established association
many years previously by purchasing the stock and “times” of retiring
members, and worked amicably with its fellow proprietors until about
1896, when a difference of opinion arose concerning an extension of
a line of omnibuses. The Company severed its connection with the
Association, and at once started working in opposition to it by taking
omnibuses from the Finsbury Park and London Bridge route and running
them on the Camden Town road. This rivalry was continued for several
weeks, but eventually the dispute was settled and the Company rejoined
the Association. Had the quarrel been protracted the other associations
would, in all probability, have sided with the Camden Town body, and
Londoners would have witnessed an exciting, although perhaps not very
edifying, struggle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account