So much for Rodin’s choice of themes. Now for his technique. One of his
singularities is that he loves to astonish people by a crude, external
contrast between a block of unworked marble and the most exquisitely
finished and sweetly polished sculpture of bodies. He takes a great
cube out of all proportion, which he leaves as the labourer hewed it as
it came out of the quarry; and he works a little corner of it into a
head and body polished with the utmost nicety. In this way, the figure
grows out of, or into, the natural stone. Looked at from three sides, a
lump of rock or stone is presented to the eye, only on the fourth side
the work of art is revealed, blooming, as it were, in the wilderness.
We may describe this manner as the sculptural form of mysticism. The
association of ideas which Rodin wishes to awaken by this device should
make the idea dawn on the consciousness that here, before our eyes, a
miracle of creation is being accomplished; that we surprise the very
incarnation of the stone; that we are witnesses of the birth of organic
form from the stiff, lifeless original matter, and may observe how the
figure, still half imprisoned in chaos, struggles painfully forth to
a form instinct with life. There are subjects for the representation
of which Rodin’s style would have been a happy invention: perhaps the
creation of Adam from a clod of earth, or the story of Deucalion and
Pyrrha, or a Promethean motive. But its uniform employment for all
possible subjects—on banal busts or groups which have no reference to
creation or genesis—causes the manner to be recognised for what it
is, a snatching at effect by means of eccentricity. Of course, this
striking and easily imitatable freak has founded a school. No American
or Scandinavian who wants to frighten the Philistines with “modernism”
neglects to exhibit a piece of, for the most part, wretched sculpture
as tiny as possible on a clump of unworked rock as Cyclopean as
possible. It cannot be said that the joke is cheap. The unhewn block of
marble often represents a pretty stiff value in hard cash, in any case
a higher one than the corner that has been chiselled. One can only say
that any idiot can succeed in using a ton weight of stone as a support
to a figure the size of a man’s hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account