How future generations will laugh over all this buffoonery of “nerve
art”! Only, indeed, when it comes to know the comments of contemporary
“intellectuals” in addition to the artists’ silly bungling. For the
former will show them in a way to excite sympathy and amusement what
devastation the deafening babble of a band of gossips, dreadfully
ignorant of art and innocent of any feeling for beauty, could produce
in the taste and thought of a large majority, which honestly yearns
after æsthetic education, but, on account of a lack of trustworthy
traditions and adequate instruction in art, has not sufficient
self-confidence to set up the promptings, however obscure, of their own
feeling against the impudent dictates of presumptuous arbiters of taste.
Mysticism and sexual psychopathy in the choice of themes; Impressionism
and incidental eccentricities in technique; overstepping the
limitations of his art, have made Rodin the great man of the fellows
who for some two decades have set the fashion in art and literature. By
these three peculiarities, to which he owes his spurious celebrity, he
will be ruined as an artist, whatever the success he owes to puffing
may be. And that is lamentable, for Rodin is a genuinely gifted
sculptor, who created beauty when he did not yet think himself bound
to work out of gratitude to the “young” journals. Unfortunately, it
is extremely improbable that he will now find his way back to that
simplicity and naturalness in which salvation is alone attainable.
There is no return from Montmartre, not, at any rate, for an old man
who has climbed this height and accepted with passionate earnestness
all what he saw and heard there in advanced years. Young people who are
still capable of change, in many cases awake from the idle dream of
Montmartre æstheticism. Nature does not vouchsafe to the old to begin a
new life.
XIV
RESURRECTION
BARTHOLOMÉ
I do not want to speak of Tolstoi’s novel, but of a work of art—great,
at any rate, materially, as a statue—which every pilgrim to Paris will,
I suppose, wish to see, viz., the monument which Bartholomé dedicated
“To the Dead,” and which is to be seen in the cemetery of Père Lachaise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account