It is interesting in so many aspects that one might devote to it a
monograph as thick as a book, which would send out suckers over the
whole domain of æsthetics and the history of art. Never do I feel so
painfully the inadequacy of a short essay as when I proceed to handle
a subject so rich in connections. It is impossible to exhaust it in
this form, and it is painful to leave it as a fragment. One appears
limited, whereas one is only restricted. We must satisfy ourselves with
indications which will easily be looked upon as superficial, though
they are merely terse. What is thought out as a proof takes the form of
mere assertion, and in cases where we should like to convince, we must
think ourselves successful, when we have incited the reader to kindly
co-operation—which, however, goes for the most part its own way.
This pious ejaculation will make it easier for me to accommodate myself
to the conditions which have been imposed on the short essay.
Works of sculpture in public places, which are neither monuments nor
ornamental buildings, viz., such as are not intended to call to mind
special events or particular individuals, are something novel in the
development of high art. Antiquity knew only monumental creations which
had their origin in patriotic sentiments. We have to bear in mind that
religion in ancient communities constituted a part of patriotism,
for there were no gods for mankind in general, but only gods for a
particular people or a particular state. When Socrates had to drain the
cup of hemlock, it was not because he had sinned against Olympus, but
because he had given offence to Athens in the person of her tutelary
divinities. The Battle of the Giants and the Frieze of the Parthenon,
the Pallas Athene of the Acropolis and the Olympian Zeus, were felt, by
those who gazed on them and for whom they had been wrought, as images
from the past and present of their race. Even the “Laocoon” and the
“Farnese Bull” were so regarded: a distinction between the legends of
their race and accredited history, nay, between theology and politics,
did not exist in the consciousness of the multitude at large, or even
in that of the select few. The god made of ivory and gold was the
public worship of a living being who was invested with high rank in
the commonwealth, and the Olympian victor to whom a statue was erected
entered into mythology as a comrade of Hercules, Theseus, and Perseus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account