It is sufficient to say few words as to his outer life. Impelled
by his bent for painting, he came to Paris at the age of twenty,
and had the good fortune to be taken as a pupil by old Corot. He
saw Th. Rousseau and Millet working with his master, and he lived
during the most susceptible years of youth amongst such originals,
in the most glorious Barbizon period. His natural tendency directed
him imperiously to landscape painting. This, then, is the substance
of his whole life as an artist. Incited by Millet’s example, in his
young days he put peasants in his fields and meadows, but they were
always mere accessories in the landscape, and arrested the eye less
than the ground and plants. He had then also sufficient knowledge of
himself to abandon, at an early stage, human figures, for he realised
that there was more life in the tiniest sod of his turf than in his
conscientious but insignificant villagers. In the high school, in
which it was his privilege to learn, he acquired that certainty and
force which distinguished him up to his old age. When, however, he had
mastered Corot’s brilliant technique and Rousseau’s draughtsmanship
and composition, he ceased to be an imitative disciple, and with full
deliberation, went his own ways, which for a time lay far from Corot’s
goal, but at last, by a wonderfully circuitous route, brought him back
to it once more. Not long did he try modestly and laudably, with a good
young man’s carefully moderated works, in the _Salon_ for certificates
of industry and good marks from the academical masters. At once he
joined the hot-headed set; he exhibited, from 1864 onwards, only in the
“Salon of the Rejected” and with the “Independents,” and became one of
the most prominent men in the group of impressionists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account