Landscape painting is, then, also a continuous illustration of the
literature of its time. It is anti-classical in the Renaissance and
Late Renaissance up to Poussin; Ossianic and Rousseauesque in the
eighteenth century, and, in Corot, is Lamartinish. It would, of course,
be going too far to point out here what the relations are between
each individual great landscape painter and the writings of his
contemporaries; and how certain notable exceptions from the rule of
parallelism between landscape painting and the fashion of the day in
literature—Salvator Rosa, Ruysdael, and Turner (just to mention only
three)—are to be explained. It is, meanwhile, not to be disputed that
the landscape painter approaches nature with a soul filled with the
literary spirit of his time, and puts into her what he has retained
from his reading. A painting, then, awakens also in the mind of the
spectator an echo of all the poetic melodies that have enthralled him,
and it is the soft echo of these thousands of poetic voices in our
soul, to which we listen when we enjoy a landscape painting.
We listen, however, in vain before a picture of Sisley’s; all is still
in our soul. This is because the painter has regarded nature from a
wholly unliterary standpoint. She awakens in him no associations of
ideas, therefore his pictures awaken none in us. He has seen the play
of colour, found his delight in it, and has taken no further thought,
but has merely striven to reproduce it accurately. We follow his
efforts with curiosity, and approve the results if they are successful.
But in this appraisement, humour and imaginative power have no part.
Is such landscape painting art, or a clever trick? The question is
worth careful consideration.
CAMILLE PISSARRO
One of the most interesting artists in our times was this Pissarro,
born at St Thomas in the Danish Antilles, though of a Dutch Jewish
family of Spanish extraction settled in Curaçoa, who died in Paris in
1903 at the age of seventy-three. He was a born painter, of the class
whose sense of form hardly exceeds the average, whose remarkably fine
perception of colour, however, reacting very strongly on every optical
irritation, makes the excitement of the retina the source for them of
profound feelings of pleasure or the contrary, and fixes their idea and
thought, to a certain extent polarises it according to colour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account