Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
youth attended a life-school, and copied at the Louvre. Next we hear
of him at Vienna, where he was a pupil of Steinle, himself a pupil
of Overbeck. Of Overbeck’s religious unction, Leighton had never a
perceptible share. Something he no doubt owed to the leaders of the
German Renaissance of Painting; but amongst these, more, it may be,
to Cornelius than Overbeck. After his sojourn in Vienna, he was back
again in Rome--these early and most prolonged wanderings are worthy
of chronicle, because they had so much to do with the formation of
the characteristics of the artist--and it was from Rome that he sent
to the Royal Academy Exhibition of 1855 a picture which made no bid
for immediately popular effect, which was nothing, moreover, of a
‘pot-boiler,’ and which made no concession to ordinary _bourgeois_
liking. It was the canvas in which is depicted, with something of
reticence and grace, and with a very learned draughtsmanship, the
procession which passed through the streets of Florence, on its way to
Santa Maria Novella, when Cimabue’s picture of the Madonna was carried
in the midst, and honour and peculiar recognition--in which a whole
city joined--were bestowed upon its painter. Elegant as the picture
was, it did not lack favour; a certain relative warmth, a certain
romantic spirit, the presentation of the ideal, it may be, in more
homely form, pleased a generation familiar with Dyce, Maclise, and
Cope; and the picture, as it happened, had an immediate success.
Paris was Leighton’s next halting-place, and now, an artist rising
above the horizon, he was no longer likely to seek direct instruction
from any one of the painters who were there at work; but he was
associated with, and was to some extent influenced by, men like Ary
Scheffer (whose ‘Augustine and Monica’ was long appreciated in England)
and Robert Fleury. He contributed almost without intermission, for
the next eight or nine years, to the Royal Academy, and it was in
1864, when he was represented by an ‘Orpheus and Eurydice,’ that he
was elected to the Associateship--becoming in 1869 a full member. The
year of his election to the Associateship was likewise the year of the
exhibition of his charming and seductive invention, ‘Golden Hours.’ To
the painter of mediæval or Renaissance history, and of themes avowedly
classic, there was vouchsafed the expression of the romantic and the
unquestionably poetic, and it is, no doubt, to the certain element of
poetry that is in Lord Leighton’s work--far more, at all events, than
to its austerer qualities of design, which never had any popularity
at all, and which, even amongst painters, have gone terribly out of
fashion--that is to be attributed part of the great favour which his
art has enjoyed. In 1869 was shown ‘Electra at the Tomb of Agamemnon,’
and in 1876 the second great processional, ‘The Daphnephoria.’ Two
years later the ‘Arts of War’--not the least dignified and decorative
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account