Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
And it is characteristic of Dutch Art, and especially of Dutch
Landscape Art, that it had no period of painful and tentative labour,
like that during which the art of earlier schools had had to struggle
slowly towards freedom of expression. Profiting no doubt by the
experience of the Past, and the recent Past especially of Bruges
and of Leyden, it gained almost at once the power of finish always
expressive, always economical, yet often very swift and summary.
The work of its earliest masters--Roghman say, and Van Goyen--has
neither pettiness of manipulation when it is most delicate, nor
uncertainty when it is most rapid. The signs of an art mature and
masculine--economy of means, decision of hand--are promptly upon it.
Roghman, it appears, made few pictures, but many drawings. There are
five-and-twenty in the Museum of Rotterdam alone. His drawings must
have been acceptable to the public of his day, and they show that a
public then existed capable of the intelligent interpretation of the
work of an artist who left much to be interpreted. Van Goyen, if he
did not make many drawings, painted many pictures with at least as
marked an economy of means as he has used in the few drawings we know.
His science of large design and the expressive completeness of his
gradations of tone, enabled him--often in picture and drawing alike--to
dispense with the easier attraction of various colour, so that even a
modern master of colour, Théodore Rousseau, was wont to hold him up as
a model to his own pupils.
Van Goyen travelled, and Roghman travelled, but their art, like that
of Rembrandt--their younger and greater contemporary, who remained at
home--continued to be not an imported art, but an art of the soil;
and it was only at a later period that the experience of travel, and
the contact with an art very different from their own, were to bring
to the Dutchmen a new method with a false ideal. There was first the
true Dutch time, rich and fertile--a time in which Van Goyen painted,
with a seeming monotony always delicately varied, the long river banks,
the low-lying towns, and the great high skies of Holland; in which
Cuyp fixed interest on the common aspects of the afternoon fields,
steaming in moist sunshine; in which Adrian van Ostade passed from
the vulgarities of the alehouse to the skilfully rendered charm of
the cottage door and the bench in the sunlight; in which Jan Steen
perfected himself in as keen and comprehensive a knowledge of the world
of men as Art has ever displayed; and in which Rembrandt contentedly
imaged Dutch life and landscape, always with nearly equal vigour,
nearly equal artistic precision, though at one time in a style that
formed the style of Gerard Dow and at another in one that was inherited
by Philip de Koningh or by Nicholas Maas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account