Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
There were various local centres for these various workers and their
works. Leyden itself was a centre--the birthplace of Rembrandt, the
birthplace of Van Goyen. The Hague became a centre, and Van Goyen
removed to it; Amsterdam a centre, and Rembrandt was a leader there.
But Haarlem was the favourite, and probably because of the privileges
that belonged to the Guild of St. Luke--St. Luke, the painters’
patron saint--which was established in that town. The Guild of St.
Luke at Haarlem has left us valuable records--not indeed the raciest,
but certainly among the most trustworthy we can hope to have access
to--upon Dutch Art, which has wanted always, and wants to-day, a
trustworthy general historian. Laurens Van der Winne (as the Dutch
writer, M. van der Willigen, tells us, in his _Artistes d’Harlem_),
towards the end of the seventeenth century, made a list of one hundred
and seventy-four men who in his time were all reputed as good painters,
and whom he had personally known. His son, in 1702, after the father’s
death, noted that of these only sixteen were then living; and the
grandson, possessing himself of manuscript books and account-books of
the period, was able to enlarge the list of early members of the Guild,
and to add to our knowledge of its laws. ‘No one without the pale of
the Society could sell or introduce his pictures. Many painters thus
found themselves obliged to join the brotherhood in order to enjoy its
advantages. Every year two sales were announced by the officer of
the Society; each member could bring to the sale whatever he desired
to sell.’ ‘Many painters were attracted to the town,’ for lesser or
longer periods; but, though many painters contributed to the Guild,
‘it appears,’ writes the Haarlem citizen, ‘that they did not all live
here.’ Notwithstanding the advantages of the Guild, the profession of
painting was not lucrative for the many. Even the busiest and most
prolific artists, like Wouvermans, were debtors sometimes to men who
befriended them. Others were so indigent that they must needs be
excused their payment of the yearly moneys to the brotherhood. In 1661,
Frans Hals, the greatest of the Haarlem masters, found himself in this
circumstance. Haarlem, since his death, has happily delighted to honour
him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account