Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
As the authorities of the National Gallery have never yet been so
fortunate as to possess a Watteau, it is well for the nation that we
have, at Dulwich, one beautiful and unexceptionable example of his
art, and it is well too that that picture is now at Burlington House.
This is the canvas known as a ‘Ball under a Colonnade’--the scene an
arcade overlooking a garden; a lady and gentleman dancing a minuet in
the foreground, and, to right and to left of them, groups of gay, happy
people, disposed with Watteau’s naturalness and Watteau’s consummate
skill. The condition of the picture is faultless, but this--with the
great master of Valenciennes--is scarcely rare. Watteau’s method was
not a method of experiment; his technique was as sound as his spirit
was vivacious. What is more remarkable--what would be remarkable
anywhere--is the perfection of accomplished workmanship, the carrying
out to the end, with all the vividness of a sketch, of a conception
definite and elaborate from the beginning. The colouring comes as an
inheritance from the Venetian--as Watteau’s adaptation of the palette
of the supreme decorators. There are many canvases by the master spirit
of the French Eighteenth Century larger of touch than this one; there
are few more happily intricate or truer to the graceful side of life,
in a world finely imagined as well as finely seen.
Next to this admirable picture, which only the Louvre, or Edinburgh,
or, it may be, Potsdam, can surpass, hangs a beautiful and interesting
work, avowedly by the pupil with whom Watteau was once angered, but
with whom in his declining days he was generously reconciled, calling
him to him, and imparting to him, as a final gift, what he could of
the secrets of his art. To Mr. Alfred de Rothschild belongs ‘The
Pleasure Barge,’ a work in which the foreground figures are on a larger
scale than in the Watteau, and in which the handling is neat and
obviously careful, even while it is broad. If Pater himself had been
the inventor of the _genre_, or even, perhaps, if he had practised
it in any fashion recognisably his own, this piece of delicate and
painter-like work--which, as it is, no one with any true appreciation
of the graceful can possibly dispraise--would have had a higher rank.
As it is, we recognise the dexterous handiwork, the pupil’s strangely
complete reception of his master’s spirit; but feel, at the same
moment, that Pater is an echo rather than a voice--that his talent
glowed only at the fire that Watteau lit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account