On chloroform and other anæsthetics: their action and administrationSnow, John
History
On chloroform and other anæsthetics: their action and administration
Snow, John
Anesthetics; Chloroform; Snow, John, 1813-1858
with a dinner knife, or a graze of the skin, producing such an amount of
fever, attended by so rapid a pulse, and so intense a flush upon the
cheeks, that I once asked the opinion of an experienced medical friend
about him, and was by that opinion alone restrained from summoning his
uncle to his bedside. He also was subject to great drowsiness, so that
he was obliged often to close his books, and retire to bed long before
his inclination would have led him to do so.”
In October 1837, Mr. Snow took out his hospital practice at the
Westminster Hospital. On May 2nd, 1838, he passed his examination, and
was entered duly as a member of the Royal College of Surgeons of
England. He lived at this time at 11, Bateman’s Buildings, Soho-square.
In July 1838, Mr. Thurnham having resigned his post of apothecary to the
Westminster Hospital, Mr. Snow, with much promise of support from the
medical staff, competed for the vacant post. He presented excellent
testimonials from Mr. Hardcastle, Mr. James Allen of York, Dr. Conquest,
Mr. W. B. Lynn, Surgeon to the Westminster Hospital, Mr. Anthony White,
Sir Anthony Carlisle, Mr. Warburton, and Dr. Hunter Lane. His canvass
was very satisfactory; but he was compelled to resign his claims from a
cause which he did not expect. By the laws of the hospital, the office
of apothecary could only be held by a member of the Apothecaries’
Company. In those days the worshipful Company were sometimes lenient in
admitting students to examination. The leniency, however, clearly
extended to those only who had friends at court. To render himself
eligible, Mr. Snow addressed a very simple, earnest, and gentlemanly
request to the Court of Examiners of the Apothecaries’ Company, begging
to be allowed to go up to his examination at the second court in July
instead of the first in October, at which he was legally admissible. The
request, under the circumstances, was not very great; but for some
reason it met with refusal. After the refusal he addressed a second note
to the Court, equal in tone with the first. In this note he urged the
simple character of the request; he reminded the sapient body that they
had allowed a similar extension of privilege to that asked by himself to
others, and even for less important reasons. He explained that he had
attended the practice of the Newcastle Infirmary; and promised that if
he could be admitted, he would fulfil the required term of hospital
curriculum rigidly. Lastly, he stated the expenses into which the
canvass had led him, and once more prayed for leniency of the examiners,
from “confidence in their kindness”. The confidence was misplaced. The
Blackfriars Shylocks demanded the pound of flesh; and our disappointed
student, on the very eve of success, was compelled to relate his
discomfiture in the following address:
“_To the Governors of Westminster Hospital._
“MY LORDS, LADIES, AND GENTLEMEN,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account