On criminal abortion in AmericaStorer, Horatio Robinson
Philosophy
On criminal abortion in America
Storer, Horatio Robinson
Abortion -- United States
Moreover, in order that the importance and various bearings of the
subject may be better appreciated, and that the writer’s position and
aims may be more fairly understood, it must be borne in mind that there
exist to this discussion certain positive and apparent objections, which
have, in a measure, given rise to much of the silence and omission
alluded to above, and are, in the main, as follows:—
1. The natural dislike of any physician to enter upon a subject on some
points of which it is probable that a portion of the profession is at
variance with him, either from disbelief in the alleged increase of
criminal abortion, unnoticed for reasons shown hereafter, or from a blind
reliance on Providence of itself to abate the evil.
2. His fear, lest by any possible chance, by showing the frequency of the
crime and its means, he may unhappily cause its still further increase.
3. The reluctance on the part of many of the profession to attack a
powerful and acknowledged moneyed interest;
4. And to tell their patients, more commonly than is yet general,
most unwelcome truth; thus not merely condemning, but, to their own
consciences at least, criminating them;
5. And individually to risk losing practice, if thought more scrupulous
than others;
6. And to be brought into more frequent contact with the law, even though
for ends of justice;
7. And to exercise greater care and discretion in diagnosis and
treatment, lest themselves be brought to answer for malpractice, or worse;
8. And publicly to discuss matters supposed to be generally unknown, and
thus seem to throw open professional secrets to the world.
And, finally, grave doubts lest the statements made, though simple and
true, should yet appear so astounding as to shock belief, or so degrading
as to tend to lessen all faith in natural affection and general morality.
But these objections, so far at least as regards the profession, are
undoubtedly but of limited existence; and, on the other hand, as more
than counterbalancing them all, are the following arguments:—
That medical men are the physical guardians of women and their offspring;
from their position and peculiar knowledge necessitated in all obstetric
matters to regulate public sentiment and to govern the tribunals of
justice.
That the discussion by them of this crime may very probably be the
means, in great measure, of ultimately restraining or suppressing its
perpetration.
That such will undoubtedly tend to save much health to the community and
many human lives.
And, that, were there no other reason, it is clearly a duty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account