Further, the very nature of these substances and their mode of action strengthen the idea that they are not only derived from the albumin of the cell-protoplasm, but that they are closely related to it. One cannot fail to be impressed with the resemblance in functional power between the unformed ferments as a class and cell-protoplasm. To what can we ascribe the particular functional power of each individual ferment? Why, for example, does pepsin act on proteid matter only in the presence of acid, and trypsin to advantage only in the presence of alkalies? Why does pepsin act only on proteid matter, and ptyalin only on starch and dextrins? Why does trypsin produce a different set of soluble products in the digestion of albumin than pepsin does? Similarly, why is it that the cell-protoplasm of one class of cells gives rise to one variety of katabolic products, while the protoplasm of another class of cells, as in a different tissue or organ, manifests its activity along totally different lines? The answer to both sets of questions is, I think, to be found in the chemical constitution of the cell-protoplasm on the one hand, and in the constitution of the individual enzymes on the other. The varied functional power of the ferment is a heritage from the cell-protoplasm, and, as I have said, is suggestive of a close relationship between the enzymes and the living protoplasm from which they originate. We might, on purely theoretical grounds, consider that these unformed ferments are isomeric bodies all derived from different modifications of albumin and with a common general structure, but with individual differences due to the extent of the hypothetical polymerization which attends their formation. Whenever, owing to any cause, the activity of the ferment is destroyed, as when it is altered by heat, strong acids, or alkalies, then the death of the ferment is to be attributed to a change in its constitution; the atoms in the molecule are rearranged, and as a result the peculiar ferment power is lost forever. The proteolytic power of these enzymes is therefore bound up in the chemical constitution of the bodies, and anything which tends to alter the latter immediately interferes with their proteolytic action. But how shall we explain the normal action of these peculiar bodies? Intensely active, capable in themselves of producing changes in large quantities of material without being destroyed, their mere presence under suitable conditions being all powerful to produce profound alterations, these enzymes play a peculiar part. Present in mere traces, they are able to transform many thousand times their weight of proteid matter into soluble and diffusible products. All that is essential is their mere presence under suitable conditions, and strangely enough the causative agent itself appears to suffer no marked change from the reactions set up between the other substances.