In the early history of physiology there was, quite naturally, little or no thought given to the nature of proteolytic changes. The gastric juice, as one of the first digestive fluids to be studied, was recognized as a kind of universal solvent for all varieties of food-stuffs, and this even long before anything was known regarding its composition, but beyond this point knowledge did not extend. Active study of the gastric juice, as you well know, dates from 1783, when the brilliant Italian investigator Spallanzani commenced his work on digestion. The names of Carminati, Werner and Montégre[1] are also associated with various phases of work and speculation in this early history of the subject, especially those which pertained to the possible presence of acid in the stomach juices. In 1824, however, Prout showed conclusively that gastric juice was truly acid, and, moreover, that the acidity was due to the presence of free hydrochloric acid, and not to an organic acid. Still, many observations failed to show the presence of an acid fluid in the stomach, and it was not until Tiedemann and Gmelin’s[2] masterly researches were published that the cause of this discrepancy was made clear. It was then seen that the secretion of an acid gastric juice was dependent upon stimulation or irritation of the mucous membrane of the stomach, and that so long as the stomach was free from food or other matter capable of stimulating the mucosa, it contained very little fluid, and that neutral or very slightly acid in reaction. These early observers also recorded the fact that the amount or strength of acid increased with the outpouring of the secretion, incidental to natural or artificial stimulation, thus giving a hint of the now well-known fact that any and every secretion may show variations in composition incidental to the character and extent of the stimulation which calls it forth. [1] See Berzelius’s Lehrbuch der Chemie, Band 9, p. 205, 4te Auflage, for an account of these early discoveries. [2] Tiedemann und Gmelin: Die Verdauung nach Versuchen. Heidelberg und Leipzig. 1826.