It would be interesting to ask the reason. Is it our metaphysical
training? Is it the failure of the philosophical schools to realize the
value of all this new raw material of study? Is it, perhaps, the fear
that “the unity of consciousness” may be endangered by the study of
Double Personality, Multiple Personality, Dissociation of Consciousness,
Dormant Complexes, Hysterias, Phobias, Obsessions, Psychoneuroses, Fixed
Ideas, Hysterical Amnesias, Hypermnesias, and the masses of other
notions correlated, roughly, under the term “unconscious”? The
suggestion of fear is not mere conjecture. Many years ago a
distinguished student of philosophy, a pupil and friend of Sir William
Hamilton, indicated to me, when I spoke to him of some recent work on
Double Personality, that he had difficulty in placing the new work,
feeling that, in admitting the possibility of multiple personality, he
was sacrificing the primary concept of philosophy, the unity of
consciousness. It did not perhaps occur to him that, when two so-called
“persons” speak together, there are, in popular language, “two
personalities”—each, no doubt, in a separate body, but each having his
own “unity of consciousness.”
If this be a fact, is there any greater difficulty in explaining the
other fact that two persons may be, as James put it, under the same hat?
The metaphysical difficulty, if there be a difficulty, is neither more
nor less in the one case than in the other. But it is needless to ask
why a whole field of study has been, relatively, neglected in this
country. For now we have begun to make up leeway.
This translation by Dr. Eder is an introduction to the latest phase of
the study of the unconscious. It brings us back to the point I began
with, the relation of the normal to the morbid. Dreams are a part of
everyone’s normal experience, yet they are shown here to be of the same
tissue, of the same mental nature, as other phenomena that are
undoubtedly morbid. Dreams therefore offer in the normal a budding-point
for the study of morbid growths. And the study of dreams by Freud came
long after his studies of such neuroses as the phobias, hysterias, and
the rest. To dreams he applied the same method of investigation and
treatment as to the others, and he found that dreams offered an
unlimited field for the same kind of study.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account