Albrecht[19] records a most interesting case in a newly born pup (Fig.
21) of double clefts extending from the lip margin upwards not only into
the nostril, but also towards the eye on either side, _i. e._ a double
associated harelip and facial cleft. The specimen is taken from the Royal
Veterinary College of Brussels.
[Illustration: FIG. 21.—Front view of a young puppy’s head from a
preparation in the Veterinary College of Brussels, showing double harelip
with double partial facial cleft. (After _Albrecht_.)
_a._ Central portion of upper lip, corresponding to internal nasal
process. _b._ Ala nasi, corresponding to external nasal process. _c._
Outer portion of upper lip, from superior maxillary process. _d._ Harelip
cleft. _e._ Facial cleft.]
[Illustration: FIG. 22.—Macrostoma, showing the cleft in the cheek
prolonged upwards and backwards by a reddish cicatrix to a lateral loss
of substance of the cranial wall. (_Sutton._)]
MACROSTOMA
_Or commissural harelip_ (French, _bec-de-lièvre genien_; German, _Quere
Gesichtsspalte_, _Wangenspalte_, or _Grossmaul_) is a less uncommon
condition, evidenced by an increased transverse diameter of the mouth.
The oral aperture extends into one or both cheeks, and, if unilateral,
is more frequently on the right side. The cleft extends upwards and
backwards towards the auditory meatus, and sometimes towards the temple
to a variable extent. It may merely be manifested by a slight increase
in the breadth of the mouth, or may extend to a considerable distance,
as in a case reported by Rynd,[20] where the mouth-opening extended as
far as the first molar on the right side, and to the last molar on the
left. Sutton[21] has published drawings of a child (Fig. 22) in which a
very large cleft existed, the angles of which gradually passed into a
red cicatrix. This scar ended in a gaping recent wound over the temporal
region, extending to the dura mater, and through this, after death, the
convolutions of the brain were visible. The condition was symmetrical,
and he suggests that the wound in the skull was probably brought about
during parturition. The same author records a condition the very opposite
of this, where the defective closure of maxillary and mandibular
processes was reduced to a minimum, the deformity amounting to nothing
more than a fistulous opening through the cheek, with a small tumour
representing an accessory auricle just in front of the tragus.
Roulland[22] has recently reported an instructive case in which double
macrostoma existed with accessory auricular appendages, but this was
also complicated with an entire absence of the middle ear and of
the Eustachian tube, with defective development and absence of the
temporo-maxillary joint on the left side. Such a deformity is probably
to be explained by an excessive obliteration or partial development of
the maxillo-mandibular cleft at its posterior extremity, and a defective
obliteration of the same anteriorly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account