On reading in relation to literatureHearn, Lafcadio
General
On reading in relation to literature
Hearn, Lafcadio
Books and reading; Literature
For the first thing which a scholar should bear in mind is that a book
ought not to be read for mere amusement. Half-educated persons read
for amusement, and are not to be blamed for it; they are incapable
of appreciating the deeper qualities that belong to a really great
literature. But a young man who has passed through a course of
university training should discipline himself at an early day never to
read for mere amusement. And once the habit of the discipline has been
formed, he will even find it impossible to read for mere amusement.
He will then impatiently throw down any book from which he cannot
obtain intellectual food, any book which does not make an appeal to
the higher emotions and to his intellect. But on the other hand, the
habit of reading for amusement becomes with thousands of people exactly
the same kind of habit as wine-drinking or opium-smoking; it is like a
narcotic, something that helps to pass the time, something that keeps
up a perpetual condition of dreaming, something that eventually results
in destroying all capacity for thought, giving exercise only to the
surface parts of the mind, and leaving the deeper springs of feeling
and the higher faculties of perception unemployed.
Let us simply state what the facts are about this kind of reading. A
young clerk, for example, reads every day on the way to his office
and on the way back, just to pass the time; and what does he read? A
novel, of course; it is very easy work, and it enables him to forget
his troubles for a moment, to dull his mind to all the little worries
of his daily routine. In one day or two days he finishes the novel;
then he gets another. He reads quickly in these days. By the end of the
year he has read between a hundred and fifty and two hundred novels;
no matter how poor he is, this luxury is possible to him, because of
the institution of circulating libraries. At the end of a few years
he has read several thousand novels. Does he like them? No; he will
tell you that they are nearly all the same, but they help him to pass
away his idle time; they have become a necessity for him; he would
be very unhappy if he could not continue this sort of reading. It is
utterly impossible that the result can be anything but a stupefying of
the faculties. He cannot even remember the names of twenty or thirty
books out of thousands; much less does he remember what they contain.
The result of all this reading means nothing but a cloudiness in his
mind. That is the direct result. The indirect result is that the mind
has been kept from developing itself. All development necessarily
means some pain; and such reading as I speak of has been employed
unconsciously as a means to avoid that pain, and the consequence is
atrophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account