On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
It is very easy to mystify a plain subject, and to represent that the
word CHURCH is of doubtful meaning; but let any reader of the Bible
answer this question:—When St. Paul wrote a letter to “the CHURCH of
Philippi,” was there any difficulty in deciding whom he meant to address?
It is plain that there existed in that city a number of families BAPTIZED
in the name of CHRIST; and that number was ruled over by certain
spiritual officers; and, as a whole, was called THE CHURCH. Wherever,
then, we find a similar body of men, we say, there is a Church. Now, we
believe that such bodies of men, so organized, and constituting, in the
aggregate, the Church Universal, or Catholic, must exist to the end of
the world; because, at the very time when CHRIST promised to set up such
an institution, He promised to it a perpetuity. “I will build My
CHURCH;” and the “gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” All this
we believe simply as it stands, putting no invisible meanings upon it.
Wherever, indeed, we meet with a spiritual truth, we receive it; but we
desire not to make or imagine one where it exists not, just to carry out
an hypothesis of our own.
We know that the spiritual rulers of the CHURCH were made so at first by
CHRIST personally, and that all the members of the CHURCH were made so in
one way, namely, by Baptism. (Gal. iii. 27.) We think that to the CHURCH
alone the peculiar promises of the Gospel were made. (2 Peter i. 4.) We
believe that there was an awful power lodged in the CHURCH, and exercised
from the beginning, through her Rulers, a power which, for example, could
exclude unworthy members from Communion, and that those so excluded were
cut off from the CHURCH’S peculiar blessing. (Matt, xviii. 18.) We think
that how much soever Excommunication might now be called a “form,” it was
no mere form in the Apostles’ days. (1 Cor. v. 5; Gal. v. 12; 1 Tim. i.
20, and v. 20.) We look with reverence therefore on the powers of the
CHURCH, in her Ministers. We dare not hastily pronounce any thing to be
“a mere matter of discipline” or “only a form,” because we feel that we
are ignorant of the mysterious ways of GOD: and none can determine the
limit which separates Divine Doctrine and Discipline. In fine, we look
upon the CHURCH herself as One Eternal SACRAMENT: the One great outward
and visible Institute, set up by CHRIST, conveying to its members His
invisible grace, through many consecrated channels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account