On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
Now all this examination of evidence, satisfactory as it is in the
result, is very far from being that easy and off-hand way of “proving the
truth of the Scriptures” which untaught people vaguely imagine to be
possible and even necessary. A similar series of remarks might be made
on the verification of the Sacraments of the Church, as being the same as
those originally instituted by our LORD, and ever practised by His
people. But, passing now to our immediate subject, it will not be
difficult to see that the Apostolicity of the Ministry, if fairly
examined with equal patience, admits of the SAME kind of proof, as either
the SACRAMENTS or the SCRIPTURES of the Church. Indeed there scarcely
seems a possibility of any traditive truth being supported by stronger
evidence than we have for the fact of the Succession; so that if this be
not true, it appears impossible to say what proof we could ever have to
substantiate any such fact.
So far back indeed as any genuine general records of past events exist,
we may boast that our Apostolical records exist. So that during these
latter, which may be called the literary ages of the world, we may trace
the existing record of the Succession in our principal dioceses for many
centuries. But this is not the kind of evidence which we could speak of,
as so abundantly satisfactory; nor could we esteem it so, even if it
reached to the Apostles’ days, and were cleared of all those doubts of
its genuineness, which we before alluded to. (page 47.) It would not be
satisfactory, for this simple, though little thought of reason, namely,
That a Succession of Bishops in one See, is not and cannot ordinarily be,
a succession of one and the same Apostolical line. So that if, for
example, we should produce a list of every Archbishop of Canterbury to
the very first, who was consecrated by a French Bishop, and should then
add the name of every one that had preceded that French Bishop in his
see, up to the Apostles’ days, still we should not have proved the
existence of any One line of Apostolical descent. No single line of
Succession confined to a single Church is possible. Every newly ordained
Bishop in every See comes of a new line; and that a threefold line, as we
shall presently notice. In addition to which, it should be borne in
mind, that the Succession was transmitted in many lines, even from the
beginning. Endeavour to examine these points more in detail.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account