On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
by primitive antiquity) it would never happen that the _same_ line of
Succession would be at all continued in any one Church, even during two
succeeding Episcopates. And, even in that case, it would be mingled with
the Succession of the two other Bishops, who had joined in the new
consecration. Hence a Succession of Bishops in any one Church is _not_ a
Succession of the same spiritual line of descent. Nay, if we had no more
to allege than the line of the Bishops of a particular Church, even
though we could enumerate them quite up to the Apostles, we should not
have proved a valid Succession. But rather the reverse; because it must
have been very possible that some one, or more, of the line might have
died suddenly, before the ordaining of the Successor; in which case the
Succession would be lost, unless some _other_ Church were applied to. It
is plain that no particular Church, whether in Constantinople,
Canterbury, or Rome, can pretend to possess an exclusive line of
Apostolic grace. It is plain that no Church can be strictly said to
“derive its orders” from another. And it only evinces a want of
thinking, for any man to say, for example, “that such and such a Church
derives its orders from the Church of Rome.” Every one must have
observed the false position in which English Churchmen have allowed
themselves to be put, by overlooking this simple point. They have thus
admitted, practically, that the Church of Rome had a private line of
Apostolical Succession, of which she could impart to others!—forgetting
that the Bishop of Rome himself is necessarily indebted to the Bishops of
three other Churches for _his own_ consecration. {60} The Succession is
and must be CATHOLIC, coming through all the Bishops of the Holy Church
throughout all the world. And in this lies our security. Just as our
persuasion of the genuineness of the Scriptures arose, not from our
seeing the originals, or the earliest copies, but from the united
testimony and criticism of Christian men; so our conviction of the
validity and necessity of the Succeeding Ministry results from a like
Catholicity of testimony. Here too, as with the Scriptures, we have
unquestioned phenomena, (the whole history of the Catholic world,) which
can only be explained by admitting the _fact_. The Church of Rome has no
more preserved our Orders, than she has our Bibles. And in this fact
lies our chief security, that no particular Church, in Rome or elsewhere,
has the Succession in its keeping, so as to be able either to keep it, or
fatally corrupt it; for it is CATHOLIC.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account