On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
And let it not be supposed that this is only a tacit way of avoiding a
difficulty, to which our principles fairly conduct us. If they be
honestly looked at, the Catholic principles have in them far more of real
charity than any others. There is a large sense, in which every Baptized
man is included in the Catholic Church, and may be, according to his
measure, partaker of Her privileges; though he may not trace the grace to
its true source, but may mistake the hand that blesses him. {102a} And
the wideness of the Catholic principle, as to the bestowal of Baptismal
grace, ought not to be lost sight of here. In the Church there seems to
have been recognized a sort of threefold validity of Baptism. The first,
{102b} as ordinarily received from a Minister of the Church; the second
{103a} pertaining to the grace of martyrdom, or “Baptism by blood;” and
the third {103b} even extending in cases of extreme necessity to
Christian Confession, and the _earnest desire_ of the Sacrament.
Doubtless, it is The All-seeing GOD alone who can decide on any
individual case. Yet it is easy to see how the Catholic doctrine does at
least open a wide door of charitable _hope_. {103c} How many even of
those who are outwardly Schismatical, may not be _wholly_ so, we can
never know here. How far the sincerity of some, or the circumstances of
others, may avail as excuses before GOD, HE only can decide. Still,
while our charity “hopeth all things,” we know that where there is
_doubt_ only, there may be danger; and charity itself would oblige us to
warn; for we think there _is_ this peril; and we warn those Churchmen of
their greater peril, who sanction Religious principles, or frequent even
doubtful assemblies, which the Church acknowledges not. They not only
endanger themselves, but by their example may fatally mislead the souls
of their brethren. But let us take the extremest case that can be
alleged, namely, that of persons wilfully guilty of total and deliberate
Schism from the Apostolic Church. When we deny to such all share in the
Church’s peculiar grace here, or glory hereafter, are we denying them
aught which they do not deny themselves? aught which they even wish to
claim? For instance—The Church has ever maintained that Baptism in the
Apostolic community conveys the most exalted and unearthly blessings, and
by consequence maintains, that the unbaptized possess them not. But is
it not a fact, that all such persons totally reject the notion of there
being any spiritual value in Baptism? Does our uncharitableness then
place them in a worse position than that which they voluntarily choose
for themselves, and resolutely defend? Surely we are rather taking a
high view of our own privileges and grace in CHRIST, than in any degree
depriving others of theirs. We leave them where they place themselves.
And it seems hard to call this a want of charity. It is impossible to
say that we are depriving of Sacraments those who do not even pretend to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account