On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
_for_ we are
all partakers of that ONE Bread!” And in the judgment of the same
Apostle, no language seemed too severe to condemn the willing violaters
of this Union. It was sacrilege to injure the least of the members; how
much more then to divide the Body? That the Baptized were “One with
CHRIST,”—that the Communicating believer was already, as it were, linked
with the verities of eternity,—were transcendent Mysteries; not bare
metaphors, but earthly forms of stating Heavenly Truths. And if every
member of CHRIST was thus sacredly looked on, so the more also was the
whole Body. “Ye are a chosen generation,” says St. Peter, “a royal
priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people.”—Every Christian indeed was
a “Temple of the HOLY GHOST:” but as S. Clement of Alexandria saith, the
CHURCH is GOD’S great Temple—“builded together for an habitation of GOD
through the SPIRIT.”
Here, then, is opened to us the great Catholic idea of the Christian
Revelation—That the mystical COMPANY of CHRIST’S people, as such, were
clothed with the heavenly Powers, and “blessed with the heavenly
blessings.”—It was in the temple “builded together” that the Divine glory
vouchsafed to dwell.—To the Church, the elect assembly, the promises had
been made. To the BODY, when in solemn meeting, the special and highest
grace of CHRIST had been granted; (and so at the appointed “gatherings
together” {134a} the Blessed Eucharist was usually celebrated.)—From the
beginning of the Gospel this had been indicated, so that even the
instituted Apostolate arose, as at CHRIST’S command, out of the CHURCH,
more as the Divine instrument of Her invisible power, than the possessor
of aught in itself. {134b} CHRIST’S words, “Thou art Peter,” were
instantly connected with the promise of building the CHURCH against which
“the gates of hell should not prevail.” The commission, “Whose soever
sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them, and whose soever sins ye
retain, they are retained,” was instantly followed by words conveying
this power of absolving and condemning, to the CHURCH, and not to the
_persons_ of the Apostles, {135} except as GOD’S instruments _in_ the
CHURCH; “_for_” it is directly added, “where two or three are _gathered
together_ in MY name, there am I.” In accordance with which declaration,
we see (in a passage before quoted) that an Apostolic condemnation of a
sinner was pronounced. “In the name of the LORD JESUS CHRIST, when ye
(i.e. the Church) are _gathered together_” (1 Cor. v. 4.) In like manner
we may trace how, from the first, the highest Authority, as well as
sacredness and favour, (Luke xxiv. 33.) was attributed to the “assembling
together” of Christians, which therefore they were urged “not to
forsake.” Thus when the door of faith was first “opened to the
Gentiles,” the Church was “_gathered together_”, (Acts xiv. 27.) and the
matter rehearsed. When the question of Judaizing arose, again “the
Apostles and Elders _came together_” (Acts xv.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account