On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
6.) When the Apostle St.
Peter was to be miraculously delivered from prison, “there were many
_gathered together_ praying” for him. (Acts xii. 12.) The announcement
of the risen SAVIOUR had been made to the “eleven _gathered together_”
(Luke xxiv. 33.) And the blessings attendant on these united assemblings
was not to be disturbed by Jewish or Gentile jealousies. Since, they had
all been “quickened _together_, and raised up _together_, and made to sit
_together_ in heavenly places in CHRIST JESUS.” (Eph. ii. 5.) And so
Christians might be addressed as “heirs _together_ of the grace of life;”
(1 Pet. iii. 7.) exhorted to be “followers _together_” of the Apostles;
(Phil. iii. 17.) and admonished to “strive _together_” for the “faith of
the Gospel.”
The majestic privileges of the Saints, in Union with CHRIST and Communion
with one another, if we contemplated them aright, would so overwhelm our
spirits, that we could not think of the “solemn assemblies” without
coveting to be there! Little as it is thought of, there is a special
awfulness in the “meeting together” of the members of this Heavenly, yet
earthly,—this Invisible, yet visible—Society; when GOD’S Eye is on every
one, when CHRIST, though unseen, is “in the midst,”—and the “hosts of
God” are encamping around! All Christians then constituting, in some
sacred and lofty sense, a “kingdom of Priests;” {137}—yet ministering
only through that Consecrated organ which CHRIST, the great High Priest,
appointed,—the Bishop, or his representative.—“GOD is very greatly to be
feared in the Council of the Saints! and to be had in reverence of all
that are round about HIM.”—Well might the ancient Fathers delight to
speak of the dignity of being a Christian! It is observable, however,
for our instruction and warning, even in this, that Tertullian, after he
embraced the Montanist heresy, carried out so erroneously the idea we
have been dwelling on, as to assign to any Christian, in cases of
necessity, the exercise of inherent Priestly functions. Such, even then,
was the perilous rashness of Private Judgment. For though the Priestly
functions are doubtless in the CHURCH, granted unto Her for Her
blessedness and perfection (1 Cor. iii. 22.); and though in our Solemn
Assemblies “all the people of the LORD are holy,” all the Baptized in
such wise sharers of the Priesthood, that they join in our ‘sacred
offerings;’ yet, we must beware of the “gainsaying of Core.” (Jude 11.)
The Catholic Church has ever held that Her Priesthood cannot be
effectually exercised otherwise than in conformity with the original
commands and ordinations of Christ. And from HIM alone the first
Ministers of the Church derived their appointment, (St. Paul speaking of
HIS as “the Ministry received OF THE LORD:” See also Col. iv. 17.), and
afterwards conveyed it to others, whom they had chosen, and on whom they
“laid their hands.” And thus St. Paul, while anxious to _vindicate and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account