Books and reading -- Great Britain; English literature -- History and criticism
The reasons which have led our older Universities to deflect
their functions (whether for good or ill) so far from their first
purpose are complicated if not many. Once admit young men in
large numbers, and youth (I call any Dean or Tutor to witness)
must be compromised with; will construe the laws of its seniors
in its own way, now and then breaking them; and will inevitably
end, by getting something of its own way.. The growth of
gymnastic, the insensible gravitation of the elderly towards
Fenner's--there to snatch a fearful joy and explain that the walk
was good for them; the Union and other debating societies;
College rivalries; the festivities of May Week; the invasion of
women students: all these may have helped. But I must dwell
discreetly on one compelling and obvious cause--the increased and
increasing unwieldiness of Knowledge. And that is the main
trouble, as I guess.
VII
Let us look it fair in the face: because it is the main practical
difficulty with which I propose that, in succeeding lectures, we
grapple. Against Knowledge I have, as the light cynic observed of
a certain lady's past, only one serious objection--that there is
so much of it. There is indeed so much of it that if with the
best will in the world you devoted yourself to it as a mere
scholar, you could not possibly digest its accumulated and still
accumulating stores. As Sir Thomas Elyot wrote in the 16th
century (using, you will observe, the very word of Mr Hamerton's
energetic but fed-up tradesman), 'Inconveniences always doe
happen by ingurgitation and excessive feedings.' An old
schoolmaster and a poet--Mr James Rhoades, late of Sherborne--
comments in words which I will quote, being unable to better
them:
This is no less true of the mind than of the body. I do not
know that a well-informed man, as such, is more worthy of
regard than a well-fed one. The brain, indeed, is a nobler
organ than the stomach, but on that very account is the less
to be excused for indulging in repletion. The temptation, I
confess, is greater, because for the brain the banquet stands
ever spread before our eyes, and is, unhappily, as
indestructible as the widow's meal and oil.
Only think what would become of us if the physical food,
by which our bodies subsist, instead of being consumed by
the eater, was passed on intact by every generation to the
next, with the superadded hoards of all the ages, the earth's
productive power meanwhile increasing year by year
beneath the unflagging hand of Science, till, as Comus
says, she
would be quite surcharged with her own weight
And strangled with her waste fertility.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account