On the Development and Distribution of Primitive Locks and Keys — John Shaqi
On the Development and Distribution of Primitive Locks and KeysPitt-Rivers, Augustus Henry Lane-Fox
History
On the Development and Distribution of Primitive Locks and Keys
Pitt-Rivers, Augustus Henry Lane-Fox
Locks and keys
We see from this, that, as is usual in like cases, the words have
followed lines of their own, and afford but little evidence of the
forms of the objects to which they have been applied, excepting in so
far that the common word "Klu" or "Clo" for lock and pin, and its
connection with the base "Klu," to move, implies that the earliest
form consisted of a movable bolt. But, in any case, whether we take
the Latin word "Sero", to put, or the Sanskrit "Klu," to move, as
independent origins of words for locks, we are carried back to a time
when it consisted of a simple bar or bolt put up or slipped through
staples to close a door. The passage in the 'Odyssey,' so often quoted
in relation to the construction of Greek door locks, does not in
reality throw much light upon the subject so long as it is unassisted
by archæological discoveries. It has been variously translated,[1] and
we are left very much to conjecture for the forms of the most
primitive kinds of locks which preceded those of which the relics are
to be found in our collections of antiquities. It is noteworthy,
however, that the earliest vestiges of apparatus connected with door
fastenings in metal, that are discovered, consist of keys, which leads
to the inference that the locks themselves may have been made of wood,
and have therefore perished. But we have survivals of primitive wooden
locks in use at the present time in different countries, which show
us, with great probability, the uses to which the keys were put, and
it is to these that we must turn in any attempt to trace back the
history of the mechanism from the commencement. The process is one,
the merits and demerits of which have been too often discussed to need
comment here. In the absence of direct archæological evidence we have
no alternative but to avail ourselves of survivals as far as possible.
The materials, however, in the case of locks are so abundant that it
will not be necessary to tax our imagination unduly in order to fill
in the links that are found wanting.
[1] 'Odyssey,' xxi., 46-50. See translations by POPE, and by
BUTCHER and LANG. I put aside all mention of knots and
strings which as Mr. SYER CUMING has observed ('Journal of
the British Archæological Association,' vol. xii., p. 117)
must have formed the fastenings employed by dwellers in
tents, and of which the Gordian knot was a complicated
example. In early times seals must often have served as
substitutes for locks, as we know was frequently the case in
ancient Egypt and Assyria. The wooden door must have given
rise to a totally different contrivance. It is possible,
however, that something analogous to the Japanese book
fastening, represented in fig. 1, Plate I., may have been
employed under both systems.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account