On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroadCallières, Monsieur de (François)
History
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad
Callières, Monsieur de (François)
Ambassadors; Diplomacy; Negotiation; Princes
The functions of a minister despatched on a mission to a foreign
country fall into two principal categories: the first to conduct
the business of his master, and the second to discover the business
of others. The first of these concerns the prince or his ministers
of state, or at all events those deputies to whom are entrusted
the examination of his proposals. In all these different kinds of
negotiation he must seek success principally by his straightforward
and honest procedure, for if he attempts to succeed by subtlety or by
a sense of superiority over those with whom he is engaged he may very
likely deceive himself. There is no prince or state which does not
possess some shrewd envoy to discern its real interests. And indeed,
even among people who seem to be the least refined, there are often
those who know their own interests best, and follow them with the most
constancy. Therefore the negotiator, no matter how able he may be, must
not attempt to teach such persons their own business, but he should
exhaust all the resources of his mind and wit to prove to them the
great advantage of the proposals which he has to make.
[Sidenote: _Diplomacy a Commerce in Benefits._]
An ancient philosopher once said that friendship between men is
nothing but a commerce in which each seeks his own interest. The
same is true or even truer of the liaisons and treaties which bind
one sovereign to another, for there is no durable treaty which is not
founded on reciprocal advantage, and indeed a treaty which does not
satisfy this condition is no treaty at all, and is apt to contain the
seeds of its own dissolution. Thus the great secret of negotiation is
to bring out prominently the common advantage to both parties of any
proposal, and so to link these advantages that they may appear equally
balanced to both parties. For this purpose when negotiations are on
foot between two sovereigns, one the greater and the other the less,
the more powerful of these two should make the first advance, and even
undertake a large outlay of money to bring about the union of interests
with his lesser neighbour, for his own self-interest will show him
that he has really the greater object and the larger advantages in
view, and that any benefits he may confer or subsidies which he may
grant to his weaker ally will be readily repaid by the success of
his designs. Now, as we have said, the secret of negotiation is to
harmonise the interests of the parties concerned. It is clear that if a
negotiator excludes the honest and straightforward method of reason and
persuasion, and adopts on the contrary a haughty and menacing manner,
then obviously he must be followed by an army ready to invade the
country in which he has put forth such provocative claims. Without such
a display of force his claims will fall to the ground, even though by
advantageous arguments they might have prevailed with the prince whom
he addressed, and who might have accepted them had they been proposed
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account