On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroadCallières, Monsieur de (François)
History
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad
Callières, Monsieur de (François)
Ambassadors; Diplomacy; Negotiation; Princes
A truth of this kind applies to friend and foe alike. Thus in the
approach to difficult negotiations the true dexterity of diplomacy,
like a good bowler using the run of the green, consists in finding the
existing bias of the matter. As Epictetus, the ancient philosopher,
said in his manual: ‘There are in every matter two handles, the one by
which it is easy to carry, the other difficult. Do not take it by the
difficult end, for if you do so you will neither be able to lift it
nor carry it. But if you take it by the right side you will carry it
without trouble.’ Now the easiest way to find the right bias is to make
each proposition which you put forward appear as a statement of the
interests of those with whom you are negotiating, for since diplomacy
is the attempt to find a basis of common action or agreement, it is
obvious that the more the opposing party can be brought to see your
designs in their own light and to accept them thus, the more surely
will their co-operation for any action be fruitful alike to themselves
and to you.
[Sidenote: _The Bias of Human Nature._]
Now, of course there are few men who will entirely divest themselves
of their own sentiments in favour of those of others, or who will
confess that they were wrong, especially if the matter be conducted in
an acrimonious discussion in which the negotiator meets all arguments
freely by contradiction. But none the less the astute diplomatist will
know how to exploit human nature in such a manner as to cause even the
most stiff-necked opponents gradually to relax their hold upon certain
opinions; and this may be most easily attained by abandoning the
approach which caused the original dispute, and taking up the matter
from another aspect. Thus by flattery of his _amour-propre_, or by some
other device which may put him in a good humour, the competitor in a
negotiation may be brought to consider the matter in a new light, and
to accept at the end of the negotiation that which he repudiated with
violence at its commencement. And, however unreasonable the majority of
mankind is, it will always be observed that men retain so much respect
for reason that they will always hope to be judged by the other man
as acting upon reasonable grounds. The negotiator will know how to
exploit this subtle form of intellectual pride. And especially where
there is more than one party to the negotiation the astute diplomatist
will be able to exploit the foibles of each of the other two parties,
and yet to flatter each in turn for his reasonable and statesmanlike
attitude.
[Sidenote: _Ce n’est que le premier pas qui coûte._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account