On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroadCallières, Monsieur de (François)
History
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad
Callières, Monsieur de (François)
Ambassadors; Diplomacy; Negotiation; Princes
Above all, at the commencement of a negotiation, as I have said, it is
necessary in any long and complicated business to present the matter
in hand in its easiest and most advantageous light, and so to speak to
insinuate all parties into it so that they may be well launched upon
the whole enterprise before they are aware of its magnitude. For this
purpose the negotiator must appear as an agreeable, enlightened, and
far-seeing person; he must beware of trying to pass himself off too
conspicuously as a crafty or adroit manipulator. The essence of skill
lies in concealing it, and the negotiator must ever strive to leave
an impression upon his fellow diplomatists of his sincerity and good
faith. And he should beware of attempting to force a decision, or to
ride roughshod over difficulties that are raised, for if he behaves
thus he will not fail to draw upon himself the aversion of those with
whom he is dealing, and thus to bring prejudice upon his master’s
designs. It would be better for him to pass for less enlightened than
he really is, and he should attempt to carry his own policy to success
by good and solid reasons rather than by pouring contempt upon the
policy of others. The opposite fault is equally to be avoided. The
negotiator must not let himself pass under the influence of other men,
especially of those powerful personalities whose wont it is to sway the
minds of all whom they meet.
[Sidenote: _Diplomacy does not thrive upon Menaces._]
The more powerful the prince, the more suave should his diplomatist
be, for since power of that kind is likely to awaken jealousy in his
neighbours, the diplomat should let it speak for itself, and rather
use his own powers of persuasion by means of moderation to support
the just rights of his prince than to vaunt his power or the extent
of his dominions. Menaces always do harm to negotiation, and they
frequently push one party to extremities to which they would not have
resorted without provocation. It is well known that injured vanity
frequently drives men into courses which a sober estimate of their
own interests would lead them to avoid. Of course when a prince has
real subjects of complaint against another, especially against an
inferior, in circumstances where it is necessary to make an example
of the delinquent, the blow must fall immediately after the threat
is given, so that the delinquent cannot be in a position, either by
the delays of diplomacy or by any other means, to shield himself from
just punishment. The longer the delay is between the threat and its
fulfilment, the more likely it is that the culprit will be able to form
alliances with other Powers, and thus avoid the just chastisement of
the prince whom he has wronged.
[Sidenote: _The Good Christian._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account