On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroadCallières, Monsieur de (François)
History
On the manner of negotiating with princes: On the uses of diplomacy; the choice of ministers and envoys; and the personal qualities necessary for success in missions abroad
Callières, Monsieur de (François)
Ambassadors; Diplomacy; Negotiation; Princes
It often happens that news is most uncertain at the moment when it is
most important. He should therefore take care to transmit it in the
proper setting of all its attendant circumstances, so that the prince
may have some material by which to judge whether the advice of his
ambassador is well founded. There is no doubt that in crises of this
kind the habit of private correspondence between the Foreign Minister
and the King and his ministers abroad is of the utmost use, for it
enables them to discuss all questions with a freedom which is denied
to despatches of a more formal kind; and it will often place the home
government in possession of knowledge which will be of the utmost value
to them. And since a true judgment of events in one country will often
depend upon what is happening in others, a diplomatist in foreign parts
will ever keep in touch with his colleagues in other foreign countries,
so that he may be informed of the course of events elsewhere. This
co-operation between ambassadors abroad is one of the most useful
features in diplomacy.
[Sidenote: _Ciphers._]
As secrecy is the very soul of diplomacy, the art of writing letters
in cipher has been invented in order to disguise the written message,
but unless the cipher is unusually clever the industry of men, whose
wits are sharpened by necessity and by self-interest, will not fail to
discover the key to it. Indeed, to such a pitch has this been brought
that there are now men who are known as professional decipherers,
though in all probability, as I believe, their reputation rests
largely upon the ineptitude of poor ciphers rather than upon their
discovery of a good cipher. For as a matter of fact experience shows
that a well-made and well-guarded cipher is practically undiscoverable
except by some betrayal, that is to say, that the wits even of the
cleverest student of ciphers will fail to pierce its secret unless
aided by corruption. It is therefore the duty of the ambassador, having
satisfied himself that the ciphers of his government are adroitly
made, to take all means for their due protection, and especially to
satisfy himself that the staff of his embassy understand not only the
use of the cipher itself, but the extreme importance of guarding it
from unauthorised eyes. And certainly the ambassador ought not to adopt
the indolent practice, of which I have known one or two cases, where
the less important part of a despatch was written _en clair_, and the
ambassador himself added the vital part in cipher. Action of that kind
is a masterpiece of futility, for it leads directly to the compromise
of the cipher itself. For if the letter fall into enemy hands it will
not be difficult for a clever spy to divine the manner of the sentence
in cipher from the context written _en clair_.
In a word, the ambassador and his staff should guard a cipher as they
would the inmost secrets of their own hearts. A really effective cipher
is literally worth far more than its weight in gold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account