On the theory of the infinite in modern thought : $b Two introductory studiesJourdain, Eleanor F. (Eleanor Frances)
Philosophy
On the theory of the infinite in modern thought : $b Two introductory studies
Jourdain, Eleanor F. (Eleanor Frances)
Infinite; Knowledge, Theory of; Pragmatism
How, again, would Hegel have rejoiced in a definition of thought and
existence which would bridge over the logical gulf in his system!
Hegel asserted that thought and existence were one. He is objected
to by many philosophers, who ask where is the _tertium quid_ which
makes it possible to reach from one to the other, or predicate their
essential unity? But the mathematician defines existence as something
which is not self-contradictory. Thought, then, to him is a form
of existence, for thought is not self-contradictory; but the two,
thought and existence, are not necessarily conterminous.[12] Hence,
to say that non-contradiction is a fundamental condition of true
thinking is as much as to say that it is a fundamental characteristic
of real existence, and he identifies thought with reality.
Dr. Caird remarks that the secular conscience conceives of the
Infinite as opposed to the Finite; the religious conscience treats
the Infinite as real, presupposed by the illusory Finite. Where does
the truth lie? Mathematics does not admit the necessity of adopting
either view at the expense of the other.
Metaphysics standing alone produces results that may be disproved,
but cannot be proved. Mathematics standing alone produces results
that are susceptible of proof. Both are based on logic, and rest on
the prerequisites of thought. Together they are a field for the best
powers of human reason: metaphysics supplies insight, intuition,
imagination; mathematics offers the indubitable proof and translates
the ideal into the actual.
But the element in philosophical thought which, employing the
psychological method, tends to the discussion of a theory of being
rather than that of knowledge, and thus to the realisation of an
ethical system rather than to metaphysical discovery, is averse from
accepting these conclusions. It remains, therefore, for us to examine
the criticism offered by the psychological school on what they call
the mathematising of philosophy; and it will be found that the attack
deals both with the ground of the alliance and its results.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account