On the theory of the infinite in modern thought : $b Two introductory studiesJourdain, Eleanor F. (Eleanor Frances)
Philosophy
On the theory of the infinite in modern thought : $b Two introductory studies
Jourdain, Eleanor F. (Eleanor Frances)
Infinite; Knowledge, Theory of; Pragmatism
Of the fourth dimension we can discover some facts by analogy. We
can count the edges of its typical figure, and apply thought to
determining some of its conditions. But a more interesting subject
of research is the inquiry into the light thrown by the theory of
four dimensions on the determination of certain atoms in chemistry,
that are known to be distinct elements, but could only be determined
actually in another dimension.[31]
“In chemistry, the molecules of a compound body are said to consist
of the atoms of the elements which are contained in the body, and
these are supposed to be situated at certain distances from one
another and to be held in their relative positions by certain
forces. At first the centres of the atoms were conceived to lie in
one and the same plane. But Wislicenus was led by researches in
paralactic acid to explain the differences of isomeric molecules of
the same structural formulæ by the different positions of the atoms
in _space_. In fact, four points can always be so arranged in space
that every two of them may have any distance from each other; and the
change of one of the six distances does not necessarily involve the
alteration of any other.
“But suppose our molecule consists of five atoms? Four of these
may be so placed that the distance between any two of them can be
made what we please. But it is no longer possible to give the fifth
atom a position such that each of the four distances by which it
is separated from the other atoms may be what we please. On the
contrary, the fourth distance is dependent on the three remaining
distances, for the space of experience has only three dimensions. If,
therefore, I have a molecule which consists of five atoms, I cannot
alter the distance between two of them without at least altering some
second distance. But if we imagine the centres of the atoms placed
in a four-dimensioned space, this can be done; all the ten distances
which may be conceived to exist between the five points will then be
independent of one another. To reach the same result in the case of
six atoms we must assume a five-dimensional space, and so on.”[32]
Here we see that if chemistry as a science is bound to take account
of all its facts, the scientist is confronted with a problem of
dimensions that is really a problem of Infinity applied not, as in
the other cases quoted, to number, but to space.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account