On the theory of the infinite in modern thought : $b Two introductory studiesJourdain, Eleanor F. (Eleanor Frances)
Philosophy
On the theory of the infinite in modern thought : $b Two introductory studies
Jourdain, Eleanor F. (Eleanor Frances)
Infinite; Knowledge, Theory of; Pragmatism
Neo-Platonism altogether separated the Infinite from the Finite. In
the Alexandrine metaphysics, which represented a decadent stage of
philosophy and its deviation from the sciences, the conception of
the Infinite became less clear and logical; it diverged from the
view which had been affected by mathematical thought, and tended
to assimilate to itself the ideas of perfection and universality,
which, philosophically speaking, are conceptions distinct from that
of Infinity--universality referring to a common principle of unity,
and perfection involving the moral ideal. Real progress was deferred
by the too rapid coherence of ideas only partially analysed and
understood. Thinkers passed quickly from the exclusive contemplation
of subject to that of object and back again,[5] each new period
negativing all previous experience, till the result was the exclusion
of an imperfectly analysed Relative and Finite from an insufficiently
apprehended Absolute and Infinite.
After the Christian era Greek philosophy drifted off into
scholasticism and lost touch of reality, the grammar of Aristotelian
logic replacing the vital connection of ideas. St. Anselm, it is
true, attempted to find a rational proof of the existence of God, and
identified Him with the Infinite of Greek thought; but St. Thomas
Aquinas led away the argument to a discussion as to how far form and
matter, separately considered, shared in the quality of Infinity. (He
thought form did, but not matter.) An overpowering sense of mystery,
joined to a premature desire for definition without scientific
analysis, sapped the vigour of mediæval thought.
Throughout the middle ages, then, we see the conditions of the Greek
period reversed: philosophy during the second period is not, as
in the first, engaged in giving a stimulus to the efforts of pure
reason; rather the intuitions of philosophy are treated as axiomatic,
and a false superstructure of knowledge, alien to experience and
reality, is erected upon these foundations. Philosophy, in fact, is
used as a general basis for science. The parts of philosophy and
mathematics, correctly though imperfectly seen by the Greeks, are in
the second period exchanged, and the result is confusion of idea.
The notion of the Infinite, as in the Alexandrine metaphysics, is
held to include perfection and universality, and does not exist as a
conception apart from these.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account