God (Christianity) -- Early works to 1800; Mysticism -- Catholic Church -- Early works to 1800; Spiritual life -- Christianity -- Early works to 1800
[36] We only lose God, the uncreated Good, by an unlawful attachment to
created good; if we are free from this attachment, we tend to Him
without effort.
[37] The subsequent condemnation, in 1687, of this doctrine, as taught
by Molino, could not, of course, be foreseen by Blessed Albertus writing
in the thirteenth century.
[38] John xiv. 6.
[39] And this she does because creatures no longer occupy her, except
for God's sake.
[40] This is so because, according to true philosophy, the essence of a
thing is distinct from its existence.
[41] Every actual cause is more intimately present to its accomplished
work than the work itself, which it necessarily precedes.
[42] John i. 3, 4.
[43] We cannot always experience Divine things, and at first we can only
compare them to the things which we experience here below.
[44] We deny that there is in God anything which is a mere potentiality,
or an imperfection. We deny in Him also the process of reasoning which
is the special work of the faculty of reason, because this implies the
absence of the vision of truth. We deny "being as it is found in
creatures," because in creatures it is necessarily limited, and subject
to accident.
[45] "Nom. Div.," i.
[46] Exod. xxxiii. 11; Num. xii. 8; Heb. iii. 2.
[47] It would be well to quote St. Thomas, the disciple of Albert the
Great, upon this important doctrine: "A thing may be said to belong to
the contemplative life in two senses, either as an essential part of it,
or as a preliminary disposition. The moral virtues do not belong to the
essence of contemplation, whose sole end is the contemplation of
truth.... But they belong to it as a necessary predisposition ...
because they calm the passions and the tumult of exterior
preoccupations, and so facilitate contemplation" ("Sum.," 2, 2{ae}, q.
180, a. 2).
This distinction should never be lost sight of in reading the mystic
books of the scholastics.
[48] John xvii. 3.
[49] Ps. xvi. 15.
[50] This admirable doctrine condemns a whole mass of insipid, shallow,
affected and sensual books and ideas, which have in modern times flooded
the world of piety, have banished from souls more wholesome thoughts,
and filled them with a questionable and injurious sentimentality.
[51] Matt. xi. 6; xiii. 57, etc.
[52] This shows an excellent grasp of the meaning of the celebrated
maxim "Perinde ac cadaver."
[53] Luke x. 42.
[54] _Ibid._
[55] Luke ii. 14.
[56] Nothing could be more conformable to the teaching of the Gospel
than this doctrine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account