This systematic and connected form of carrying on war only became
possible when states took regular troops into their service in place of
the feudal armies. The obligation of the feudal law was then commuted
into a fine or contribution: personal service either came to an end,
enlistment being substituted, or it was only continued amongst the
lowest classes, as the nobility regarded the furnishing a quota of men
(as is still done in Russia and Hungary) as a kind of tribute, a tax in
men. In every case, as we have elsewhere observed, armies became
henceforward, an instrument of the cabinet, their principal basis being
the treasury or the revenue of the government.
Just the same kind of thing which took place in the mode of raising and
keeping up an establishment of troops could not but follow in the mode
of subsisting them. The privileged classes having been released from
the first of these services on payment of a contribution in money, the
expense of the latter could not be again imposed on them quite so
easily. The cabinet and the treasury had therefore to provide for the
subsistence of the army, and could not allow it to be maintained in its
own country at the expense of the people. Administrations were
therefore obliged to look upon the subsistence of the army as an affair
for which they were specially responsible. The subsistence thus became
more difficult in two ways: first, because it was an affair belonging
to government, and next, because the forces required to be permanently
embodied to confront those kept up in other states.
Thus arose a separate military class in the population, with an
independent organisation provided for its subsistence, and carried out
to the utmost possible perfection.
Not only were stores of provisions collected, either by purchase or by
deliveries in kind from the landed estates (Dominiallieferungen),
consequently from distant points, and lodged in magazines, but they
were also forwarded from these by means of special wagons, baked near
the quarters of the troops in ovens temporarily established, and from
thence again carried away at last by the troops, by means of another
system of transport attached to the army itself. We take a glance at
this system not merely from its being characteristic of the military
arrangements of the period, but also because it is a system which can
never be entirely done away; some parts of it must continually
reappear.
Thus military organisation strove perpetually towards becoming more
independent of people and country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account