The consequence was that in this manner war became certainly a more
systematic and more regular affair, and more subordinated to the
military, that is the political object; but it was at the same time
also much straitened and impeded in its movement, and infinitely
weakened in energy. For now an army was tied to its magazines, limited
to the working powers of its transport service, and it naturally
followed that the tendency of everything was to economise the
subsistence of the troops. The soldier fed on a wretched pittance of
bread, moved about like a shadow, and no prospect of a change for the
better comforted him under his privations.
Whoever treats this miserable way of feeding soldiers as a matter of no
moment, and points to what Frederick the Great did with soldiers
subsisted in this manner, only takes a partial view of the matter. The
power of enduring privations is one of the finest virtues in a soldier,
and without it no army is animated with the true military spirit; but
such privation must be of a temporary kind, commanded by the force of
circumstances, and not the consequence of a wretchedly bad system, or
of a parsimonious abstract calculation of the smallest ration that a
man can exist upon. When such is the case the powers of the men
individually will always deteriorate physically and morally. What
Frederick the Great managed to do with his soldiers cannot be taken as
a standard for us, partly because he was opposed to those who pursued a
similar system, partly because we do not know how much more he might
have effected if he had been able to let his troops live as Buonaparte
allowed his whenever circumstances permitted.
The feeding of horses by an artificial system of supply is, however, an
experiment which has not been tried, because forage is much more
difficult to provide on account of its bulk. A ration for a horse
weighs about ten times as much as one for a man, and the number of
horses with an army is more than one-tenth the number of men, at
present it is one-fourth to one-third, and formerly it was one-third to
one-half, therefore the weight of the forage required is three, four,
or five times as much as that of the soldier’s rations required for the
same period of time; on this account the shortest and most direct means
were taken to meet the wants of an army in this respect, that is by
foraging expeditions. Now these expeditions occasioned great
inconvenience in the conduct of war in other ways, first by making it a
principal object to keep the war in the enemy’s country; and next
because they made it impossible to remain very long in one part of the
country. However, at the time of the Silesian war, foraging expeditions
were much less frequent, they were found to occasion a much greater
drain upon the country, and much greater waste than if the requirements
were satisfied by means of requisitions and imposts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account