When the French Revolution suddenly brought again upon the war stage a
national army, the means which governments could command were found
insufficient, and the whole system of war, which had its origin in the
limited extent of these means, and found again its security in this
limitation, fell to pieces, and of course in the downfall of the whole
was included that of the branch of which we are now speaking, the
system of subsistence. Without troubling themselves about magazines,
and still less about such an organisation as the artificial clockwork
of which we have spoken, by which the different divisions of the
transport service went round like a wheel, the leading spirits of the
revolution sent their soldiers into the field, forced their generals to
fight, subsisted, reinforced their armies, and kept alive the war by a
system of exaction, and of helping themselves to all they required by
robbery and plunder.
Between these two extremes the war under Buonaparte, and against him,
preserved a sort of medium, that is to say, it just made use of such
means as suited it best amongst all that were available; and so it will
be also in future.
The modern method of subsisting troops, that is, seizing every thing
which is to be found in the country without regard to _meum et tuum_
may be carried out in four different ways: that is, subsisting on the
inhabitant, contributions which the troops themselves look after,
general contributions and magazines. All four are generally applied
together, one generally prevailing more than the others: still it
sometimes happens that only one is applied entirely by itself.
1.—Living on the inhabitants, or on the community, which is the same
thing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account