One Hundred Years in Yosemite: The Story of a Great Park and Its FriendsRussell, Carl Parcher
History
One Hundred Years in Yosemite: The Story of a Great Park and Its Friends
Russell, Carl Parcher
Yosemite National Park (Calif.) -- History; Yosemite Valley (Calif.) -- History
The State Park Act provided that the Yosemite Grant and the Mariposa Big
Trees should be managed by a board of commissioners, of whom the
governor of the state was to be one. On September 28, 1864, three months
after the grant was made, Governor F. K. Low proclaimed that trespassing
upon the tracts involved must desist. His board of Yosemite
commissioners was appointed in the same proclamation.
Frederick Law Olmsted, even then an accomplished landscape architect,
was made chairman of the board. As Brockman (1946, p. 106) has revealed
in his article on Olmsted, the chairman was also the first
administrative officer of the Yosemite Grant. Olmsted’s statement of
1890 substantiates this fact: “I had the honor to be made chairman of
the first Yosemite Commission, and in that capacity to take possession
of the Valley for the State, to organize and direct the survey of it and
to be the executive of various measures taken to guard the elements of
its scenery from fires, trespassers and abuse. In the performance of
these duties I visited the Valley frequently, established a permanent
camp in it and virtually acted as its Superintendent.”
Legal acceptance of the gift could not be made until the next session of
the state legislature. On April 2, 1866, the necessary provisions for
administration were secured. The board of commissioners made the best
possible selection of a guardian, the Yosemite pioneer, Galen Clark, and
invited the settlers of the valley to vacate their holdings.
J. M. Hutchings, as might be expected, was wrathy. It is probable that
James Lamon, after eight years of permanent residence on his land, saw
no justice in the act. The other claimants held out for what might be in
it. Hutchings and Lamon refused to surrender their property, and a test
suit was brought against Hutchings, which was decided in his favor. This
was carried to the supreme court of the state and then to the federal
Supreme Court. In these last actions the commissioners were sustained.
That Hutchings and Lamon were deserving of consideration and
remuneration cannot be denied, but millions of Americans are today
indebted to the board of commissioners who pursued the case to a
settlement favorable to the people. Private titles of the type held by
the Yosemite Valley settlers would have been disastrous to all
administration in the years that were to come.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account