Draft -- Great Britain; Great Britain -- Defenses; World War, 1914-1918
As regards the Army, however, it was entirely different. There had
been no intelligent effort to keep our military strength abreast of our
policy; and as, in many instances, it would have been too bitter a
humiliation to keep our policy within the limits of our military
strength, the course actually pursued can only be described fitly as a
game of bluff.
There had never been anything approaching agreement with regard to the
functions which the Army was expected to perform. Not only did
political parties differ one from another upon this primary and
fundamental question, but hardly two succeeding War Ministers had
viewed it in the same light. There had been schemes of a bewildering
variety; but as the final purpose for which soldiers existed had never
yet been frankly laid down and accepted, each of these plans in turn
had been discredited by attacks, which called in question the very
basis of the proposed reformation.
[Sidenote: THE NAVAL POSITION]
While naval policy had been framed and carried out in accordance with
certain acknowledged necessities of national existence, military policy
had been alternately expanded and deflated in order to assuage the
anxieties, while conforming to the prejudices--real or supposed--of the
British public. In the case of the fleet, we had very fortunately
arrived, more than a generation ago, at the point where it was a
question of what the country needed; as regards the {238} Army, it was
still a question of what the country would stand. But how could even a
politician know what the country would stand until the full case had
been laid before the country? How was it that while Ministers of both
parties had the courage to put the issue more or less nakedly in the
matter of ships, they grew timid as soon as the discussion turned on
army corps? If the needs of the Commonwealth were to be the touchstone
in the one case, why not also in the other? The country will stand a
great deal more than the politicians think; and it will stand almost
anything better than vacillation, evasion, and untruth. In army
matters, unfortunately, it has had experience of little else since the
battle of Waterloo.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account